1 / 11
文档名称:

对全球价值链的投入如何影响产业集群的升级【外文翻译】.doc

格式:doc   页数:11页
下载后只包含 1 个 DOC 格式的文档,没有任何的图纸或源代码,查看文件列表

如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点这里二次下载

分享

预览

对全球价值链的投入如何影响产业集群的升级【外文翻译】.doc

上传人:问道九霄 2012/4/9 文件大小:0 KB

下载得到文件列表

对全球价值链的投入如何影响产业集群的升级【外文翻译】.doc

文档介绍

文档介绍:本科毕业论文外文翻译
外文题目: How Does Insertion In Global Value Chins Affect Upgrading In Industrial Clusters
出处: Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9RE, UK.
作者: John Humphrey and Hubert Schmitz
原文:
How does insertion in global value chains affect upgrading in industrial clusters?

What is the scope for local upgrading strategies where producers operate in global value chains? The literature on industrial clusters emphasises the role of inter-firm co-operation and local institutions in enabling upgrading. The value chain literature focuses on the role of global buyers and chain governance in defining upgrading opportunities. This paper argues that clusters are inserted into global value chains in different ways, and that this has consequences for enabling or disabling local-level upgrading efforts. It pays particular attention to the position of developing country firms selling to large, global buyers.
Keywords: clusters, value chains, competitiveness, upgrading, developing countries
1 Introduction
Firms in developing countries, mon with firms everywhere, are under pressure to improve their performance and increase petitiveness. New, low-cost producers are entering global markets, petition in markets for labour-intensive manufactures. How can firms in developing countries respond to this type of challenge while at the same time maintaining returns to both labour and capital from engaging in trade? The literature petitiveness suggests that the most viable response is to ‘upgrade’- to make better products, make them more efficiently, or move into more skilled activities (PORTER, 1990; KAPLINSKY, 2000).
Several schools of thought have emphasised the local determinants petitiveness, including the ‘new economic geography’, business studies, regional science and innovation
studies. Not only is some of this literature optimistic about the possibility of petitiveness through local or regional industrial policy (. COOKE and MORGAN,