文档介绍：该【室内设计外文翻译--作为公共空间-图书馆设计和公共空间的创建 】是由【guwutang】上传分享，文档一共【17】页，该文档可以免费在线阅读，需要了解更多关于【室内设计外文翻译--作为公共空间-图书馆设计和公共空间的创建 】的内容，可以使用淘豆网的站内搜索功能，选择自己适合的文档，以下文字是截取该文章内的部分文字，如需要获得完整电子版，请下载此文档到您的设备，方便您编辑和打印。大连理工大学毕业设计(论文)格式规范作为公共空间:图书馆设计和公共空间的创建2–17–本科外文翻译作为公共空间:图书馆设计和公共空间的创建ingPublic:LibraryDesignAndTheCreationOfPublicSpace学部(院):建筑与艺术学院专业:环境设计学生姓名:学号:指导教师:完成日期:2015年4月10日大连理工大学毕业设计(论文)格式规范作为公共空间:图书馆设计和公共空间的创建2–2–ingPublic:LibraryDesignAndTheCreationOfPublicSpaceByMeganClarkAbstract:,,aspublicspaces,:library;publicspace;(2009),,evenonthesmallestscale,,(论文)格式规范作为公共空间:图书馆设计和公共空间的创建2–4–Beforeconsideringlibraryarchitectureanddesign,itisimportanttoexplorethelibrary’(1987)definespublicspaceasa,“sphereofbroadandlargelyunplannedencounter”().Thepublicsphereisaplaceteemingwithunexpectedencounterswhichbringalongwiththemmanychallenges,contradictions,,leftwaiting,,andthisflexibilityisrewardedwiththefruitsofpubliclifeincluding:convenience(streetsandtransit),beauty(parksandarchitecture),(1987)makestheimportantobservationthat“aspaceismadepublicbythenatureofitsboundary”().,,atleastideally,,andtherefore,,intheoryandinuse,emorecontrolledandsegregated(Sickie&Hopkins,2002).(1987)emphasizesthespecialrelationshipbetweenmembersofthepublic,writingthatpublicspaces,“bringtogetherpeoplewhodonotknoweachotherinanintimate,privatesocialfashionandinmostcasesdonotcaretoknoweachotherinthatfashion”().Itisexpected,acceptable,fortableinteractions,-policingofthepublic(Sickie&Hopkins,2002).Theexpectationsofpublicbehavearethereforereinforcedbysocialmores;although,becausepublicspaceoftenintroducespeoplefromavarietyofclassesandbackgrounds,(2001)givestheexampleofahomelesswoman,undressinginordertocleanherself,usingthelibrary’,arecentsurveyofUnitedKingdomlibrarypatronsconcludedthatpubliclibrariesareseenasasafeenvironment(Dewe,2006).大连理工大学毕业设计(论文)格式规范作为公共空间:图书馆设计和公共空间的创建2–4–Currently,,theresourcesprovidedtosupportpublicspacesaswellasadevelopedunderstandingoftheimportanceofpublicspacehasdeclined(Tangelo,2006).Apologistshavearguedthatthelibraryisoneofthefewremainingauthenticpublicspaces(Given&Sickie,2003).Yet,asprivatespacesexpandtoprovidesimilarservices(acoffeeshopasagatheringplace,bookstoreswithcouchesandreadingspaces),,(Blazer&Lila,1987).TheLibraryasPublicSpace:TheBuilding“Architecture,byitsverynature,,economic,ormoraldimensions,wemustbeprepared,atthesametime,totreatthosedimensionsinpublicterms:toseethatbuildingscanalsoserveaspublicart,orascivicmonuments,orascontributionstothesociallifeofthecity.”(Blazer&Lila,1987,p..ix)“determinesymbolismovertime”(Vale,1992).,(Official,2010).(theoldandnewphilosophiesofthelibrary),fortablywithinthepublicspherewhereavarietyofinterpretations,opinions,(论文)格式规范作为公共空间:图书馆设计和公共空间的创建2–6–municateanevolvingsetofvalues,ess,munityinvolvement..Fasick(2011)demonstratesthisclearlybyarguingthat“everypublicbuildingcontainsametaphor–avisionofwhatthebuildingrepresents”().Hegoesontosuggestthatthemetaphorsthathavebeenexemplifiedinrecentlibrarybuildingprojectsincludeexploration,asecureplace,aninformationshoppingcenter,andatheater().,theSeattlePublicLibrary,builtin2004,employsanexpanseofglasswallstosymbolizeopenness(Fasick,2011).Similarly,mons(May&Black,2010).Theoristsofcontemporarylibrarydesignrepeatedlyemphasizeflexibility(Waldensian,2003).,thepermanenceoftheolderdesignprincipleshavebeenreplacedbothliterally,bymoreflexibledesignsandfurniture,“librarywithoutwalls”,,arecentstudyofNovaScoutlibrarypatronsrevealedtheywere“unanimousintheimportancetheyplacedonphysicalspace”(May&Black,2010,).DesignandInteractioninthePublicLibraryUltimately,itisneitherthearchitecturenorthefactofaplacebeingpublicthatdeterminesitssignificancetoanindividual,,“inhuman,”“sterile,”or“fortable”(Cohen&Cohen,1979,-4).Instead,“placestakeonmeaningsthroughourparticipationwiththem”(Lyndon,1987,).Eventhesimplestlibrarydesignscanhaveanenduringimpactontheuser’,whenrecallinghischildhoodlibraryWald(2011)describedthe“well-stockedwarrenofinterconnectedsand-coloredbrickbuildings”().’,,expectations,-ownershipofapublicspace(tovaryingdegreesabidingbytherulesofthespace).大连理工大学毕业设计(论文)格式规范作为公共空间:图书馆设计和公共空间的创建2–6–,,,butwithlimitations,,(Cohen&Cohen,1979).Thisdevelopmentoffamiliarityandattachmentstosmallsub-“thirdspace”describedbyRayOldenburg(1999)inGreat,,althoughBrandenburgideahasbeenappliedtopublicspaces,mercialenterprisesinhisseminalexplorationofthe“thirdplace.”Thelibraryintheroleofa“thirdplace”(Harris,2007).TheUrgeandRighttoDisruptAsaresultofthesenseofbelonging,(2009),noisyidleness,andmysteriousindividualshedescribesas“synagoguesengagedinresearchquiteoutsideofacademia”().Collins’,inthecaseoftheLibraryofCongressquiet,officialstudyandresearch,patronswillfindotherusesandthistypeofbehaveiswhattransformsabuildingintoaplace(Collins,2009).大连理工大学毕业设计(论文)格式规范作为公共空间:图书馆设计和公共空间的创建2–8–WhilethemissionoftheLibraryofCongressismuchdifferentthanthatofastandardbranchlibrary,thenecessityofamiabledisruptionisequally,ifnotmore,“feelingathome”inapublicspace,individualswillmovefurnituretobettersuittheirneedandleavetheirbelongingsattablesandcarrelsastheyexplorethespace(Cohen&Cohen,1979;Given&Sickie,2003).,(2010).AloneinPublic:IndividualswithinthePublicLibraryTheoriesonpubliclifemaintainthatpublicspaceembodiesthe“paradoxofvisibilityandisolation”(t,1987,).,,andtherefore,munity’