文档介绍：“知假买假”行为适用惩罚性赔偿分析——从《消费者权益保护法实施条例》(送审稿) 切入
孙倩倩
郑州大学
X
关注成功!
加关注后您将方便地在我的关注中得到本文献的被引频次变化的通知!
新浪微博
腾讯微博
人人网
开心网
豆瓣网
网易微博
摘    要:
知假买假行为是否适用《消费者权益保护法》的惩罚性赔偿, 各地法院认识不一, 争议颇大。近期, 国家工商总局公布的《消费者权益保护法实施条例》(送审稿) 明确了“以牟利为目的购买、使用商品或接受服务的, 不适用本条例”, 这意味着职业打假人将不再受《消费者权益保护法》的保护。事实上, 保护以牟利为目的的“知假买假”行为本质上有违《消费者权益保护法》的立法宗旨, 而且该知假买假者并不属于消费者的范畴, 其行为也违背了诚实信用原则, 不应适用《消费者权益保护法》规定的惩罚性赔偿。但对于以牟利为目的的“知假买假”行为立法上仍需要更清晰明确的释义。
关键词:
知假买假; 诚实信用原则; 惩罚性赔偿;
作者简介:孙倩倩(1996-) , 女, 河南洛阳人, 郑州大学法学院学生。
收稿日期:2017-06-02
Analysis of the Application of Punitive Damages in the Act of “Buying Fake on Purpose”——From the “Implementation Regulations of Consumer Protection Law”(Draft)
SUN Qian-qian
Zhengzhou University;
Abstract:
Different courts hold different opinions on the problem whether the act of buying fake on purpose is applicable to the punitive damages of “Consumer Protection Law”. Recently, the “Implementation Regulations of Consumer Protection Law”(draft) issued by SAIC has made clear that “buying, using, or receiving services for the purpose of making profits is not applicable to these regulations”, which means that professional anti-fake people will no longer be protected by “Consumer Protection Law”. In fact, the protection of those acts of “buying fake”for the purpose of making profits is essentially against the legislative purpose of “Consumer Protection Law”, and those who buy fake