文档介绍：该【2025年考研英语备考：备战阅读理解（合集6篇） 】是由【448】上传分享，文档一共【17】页，该文档可以免费在线阅读，需要了解更多关于【2025年考研英语备考：备战阅读理解（合集6篇） 】的内容，可以使用淘豆网的站内搜索功能，选择自己适合的文档，以下文字是截取该文章内的部分文字，如需要获得完整电子版，请下载此文档到您的设备，方便您编辑和打印。
2025年考研英语备考：备战阅读理解（合集6篇）
篇1：考研英语备考：备战阅读理解
虽然的考研脚步才刚刚开始消失于大家的视线中，虽然现在距离考研差不多还有一年的时间，但是考研学子们已经开始把寒假复习计划提到日事议程当中来了。如果要在这一年时间里不仅要完成正常的学习生活计划，同时又要轻松面对考研，这的确需要大家来认真规划，
备考资料 要想把阅读搞好一是要理解、二是要速度。英语考试时间为3个小时，其中阅读部分由4篇阅读文章组成。时间是足够的，但很多人会觉得时间上紧张。这里建议考研学子们应该养成精细阅读的习惯。从现在开始，让自己沉浸在英语阅读的氛围里，计划好每一周时间阅读的量和速度，直到考试前夕。怎样来进行阅读的练习呢?研粒儿们需要做得是1周做一套题：周一用1个小时的时间阅读4篇文章。一定要按照规定的时间做，培养自己在有限时间里精细阅读的习惯。周二至周五精读每篇文章，每天一篇。周六把这套题的阅读部分再整几周做的题系统复习一遍。基础较差的同学须在6月底之前将阅读材料做一遍，然后再稚以每周做一套题的基础上扩大自己的泛读量，一直坚持到考试之前。
光有精读是不够的，提高你的英语水平还要通过大量的泛听和泛读。根据自己的实际情况，在还有精力的情况下可以锁定《经济学人》、《新闻周刊》、《复习精编》等英美报刊，最好是最近几年的社会浚考研阅读文章通常是400左右单词量，因此，阅读报刊时锁定600左右单词量的文章就可以了。
篇2：考研英语备考 备战阅读理解
2014考研英语备考 备战阅读理解
考研的成功取决于多方面的因素，不仅需要坚强的毅力、充足的体力、正常的智力，而且需要备考的考生们一定要根据自身的情况制定合适的计划。凡事预则立，面对2014考研英语复习，不少学子询问从哪下手?如何复习?在此针对英语阅读复习整理出一些备考方法，希望对大家有所帮助!
虽然20的考研脚步才刚刚开始消失于大家的视线中，虽然现在距离2014考研差不多还有一年的时间，但是考研学子们已经开始把寒假复习计划提到日事议程当中来了。如果要在这一年时间里不仅要完成正常的学习生活计划，同时又要轻松面对考研，这的确需要大家来认真规划。
精读=理解+速度
要想把阅读搞好一是要理解、二是要速度。英语考试时间为3个小时，其中阅读部分由4篇阅读文章组成。时间是足够的，但很多人会觉得时间上紧张。这里建议考研学子们应该养成精细阅读的习惯。从现在开始，让自己沉浸在英语阅读的氛围里，计划好每一周时间阅读的量和速度，直到考试前夕。怎样来进行阅读的练习呢?研粒儿们需要做得是1周做一套题：周一用1个小时的时间阅读4篇文章。，培养自己在有限时间里精细阅读的习惯。周二至周五精读每篇文章，每天一篇。周六把这套题的阅读部分再整几周做的题系统复习一遍。基础较差的同学须在6月底之前将阅读材料做一遍，然后再稚以每周做一套题的基础上扩大自己的泛读量，一直坚持到考试之前。
光有精读是不够的，提高你的英语水平还要通过大量的泛听和泛读。根据自己的实际情况，在还有精力的情况下可以锁定《经济学人》、《新闻周刊》、《时代周刊》等英美报刊，最好是最近几年的社会浚考研阅读文章通常是400左右单词量，因此，阅读报刊时锁定600左右单词量的文章就可以了。
篇3：考研英语全攻略 备战阅读理解
考研英语全攻略 备战阅读理解
虽然的`考研脚步才刚刚开始消失于大家的视线中，虽然现在距离2014考研差不多还有一年的时间，但是考研学子们已经开始把寒假复习计划提到日事议程当中来了。如果要在这一年时间里不仅要完成正常的学习生活计划，同时又要轻松面对考研，这的确需要大家来认真规划。
精读=理解+速度
要想把阅读搞好一是要理解、二是要速度。英语考试时间为3个小时，其中阅读部分由4 篇阅读文章组成。时间是足 够的，但很多人会觉得时间上紧张。这里建议考研学子们应该养成精细阅读的习惯。从现在开始，让自己沉浸在英语阅读的氛围里，计划好每一周时间阅读的量和速度，直到考试前夕。怎样来进行阅读的练习呢?研粒儿们需要做得是1周做一套题：周一用1个小时的时间阅读4篇文章。一定要按照规定的时间做，培养自己在有限时间里精细阅读的习惯。周二至周五精读每篇文章，每天一篇。周六把这套题的阅读部分再整几周做的题系统复习一遍。基础较差的同学须在6月底之前将阅读材料做一遍，然后再稚以每周做一套题的基础上扩大自己的泛读量，一直坚持到考试之前。
光有精读是不够的，提高你的英语水平还要通过大量的泛听和泛读。根据自己的实际情况，在还有精力的情况下可以锁定《经济学人》、《新闻周刊》、《时代周刊》等英美报刊，最好是最近几年的社会浚考研阅读文章通常是400左右单词量，因此，阅读报刊时锁定600左右单词量的文章就可以了。
精彩链接
考研英语复习要趁早 时间等于分数
考研英语 全方位解读阅读复习策略
考研英语复习要做阅读先懂阅读
考研英语 从大纲解读阅读复习策略
篇4：考研英语备考阅读理解练习题
IF YOU'RE CONFUSED BY ALL the news about the health effects of eating fish， you're not alone. On one hand， the omega-3 fatty acids in fish are known to reduce the risk of heart disease， as the American Heart Association reminded us two weeks ago when it restated its recommendation that everybody eat at least two fish servings a week. On the other hand， fish that feed in contaminated waterways contain high levels of mercury， which can lead to cognitive problems in developing brains. That's why pregnant women and nursing mothers are advised to limit their consumption.
As if that weren't confusing enough， two new studies published last week in the New England Journal of Medicine investigated the possible effects of mercury on the heart， and they seem to have reached contradictory conclusions. One found no clear link between mercury levels and heart disease; the other found that men with high levels of mercury in their toenails were more likely to suffer a heart attack than those with low levels. What are we to make of this? The first thing to remember is that this is how science proceeds， by fits and starts and seemingly contradictory results that get resolved only by further study. The second is that not all fish are created equal.
Compared with all the other things you might eat， fish are an excellent source of protein. They tend to eat algae as part of their natural life cycle， converting it into omega-3 fatty acids that can improve your cholesterol profile. But it's also true that our waterways have become increasingly contaminated with all sorts of pollutants， including mercury， and that these pollutants tend to accumulate at different levels in different species. The fish most at risk are predators high in the pelagic food chain， such as swordfish and sharks (see chart)。
It was to test the effects of mercury on the heart that the two new studies compared the mercury levels in clippings from toenails， where heavy metals tend to be deposited. In one study， researchers led by Dr. Eliseo Guallar at Johns Hopkins found that European and Israeli men with the highest mercury levels were nearly times as likely to have a heart attack as those with the lowest levels. The other study， led by Dr. Walter Willett at the Harvard School of Public Health， looked at a selection of American men and found no connection between mercury exposure and risk of heart disease， although Willett told me a “weak association” cannot be ruled out.
For most of us， eating two servings of fish a week should not pose any problems. Guallar， who hails from coastal Spain， continues to flavor his paella with salmon， which has negligible mercury levels. Willett eats swordfish only about twice a month――because of its expense， not any fear of mercury. Fish-oil supplements are high in omega3 fatty acids and probably don't contain as much mercury as whole fish. But they don't taste nearly as good.
1. In the opening paragraph， the author introduces his topic by
[A]making a comparison
[B]justifying an assumption
[C]posing a contrast
[D]explaining a phenomenon
2. The phrase “by fits and starts”(Line 6， Paragraph 2) most probably means _______.
[A]something happens smoothly
[B]something keeps starting and then stopping again
[C]something deserves a lot of effort
[D]something is troublesome
3. Clippings from toenails were chosen for the research most probably because _______.
[A]they are more likely to contain mercury
[B]they influence a person‘s heart
[C]they can be easily obtained
[D]they are connected with the heart
4. The views of Dr. Eliseo Guallar and Dr. Walter Willett are ______.
[A]identical
[B]similar
[C]opposite
[D]complementary
5. What can we infer from the last paragraph?
[A]Fish is no threat to Man.
[B]Do not be frightened by some fish.
[C]Eat Fish-oil supplements instead of fish.
[D]Taste is more important than the safety of the food.
答案：CBACB
篇5：2018考研英语阅读理解备考试题
备考试题一：
I had two routine checkups last week， and both the eye doctor and the dentist asked me to my health history for their records. Their requests made sense. Health-care providers should know what problems their patients have had and what medications they're taking to be on the lookout for potential trouble or complications.
On each history， however， the section labeled FAMILY HEALTH HISTORY gave me pause. Few diseases are purely genetic， but plenty have genetic components. If my father suffered from elevated LDL， or bad cholesterol， my doctor should know that， because I'm probably at higher risk. If my mother had breast cancer， my sister (if I had one) would want her physician to be especially vigilant.
While I know something about the history of my parents' health-my father had prostate cancer at a relatively young age and suffered from macular degeneration and Parkinson's disease， and my mother died of lung cancer-there's plenty I don't know. What were my parents' cholesterol numbers and blood pressures? I assume I would have known if either suffered from diabetes， but I can't swear to that. And when it comes to my grandparents， whose genes I also have， I'm even more in the dark.
That makes me fairly typical. According to Dr. Richard Carmona， the . Surgeon General， only about a third of Americans have even tried to put together a family-health history. That's why he has launched the Family History Initiative and declared Thanksgiving National Family History Day. Sitting around the turkey talking about cancer and heart disease may seem like a grim thing to do when you're supposed to be giving thanks for everything that's going right. But since many families will be gathering for the holiday anyway， it's a perfect time to create a medical family tree.
And the Surgeon General is making it easy： if you go to ， you can use the Frequently Asked Questions link to find out which diseases tend to run in families， which ones you should be most and least worried about， and what to do if， like me， your parents and grandparents have passed away. You can also download a free piece of software called My Family Health Portrait， which helps you organize the information. The program prints that out in a easy-to-read form you can give to your doctors.
The website insists the software is “fun”， but that may be going a bit far. In any case， it's available only for Windows machines， so Mac users and people without computers have to use a printed version of the tree. It's worth it， though， since it could help save your life or the life of your children someday.
注(1)：本文选自Time; 11/22/， p100;
注(2)：本文习题命题模仿对象为真题Text 1;
1. In the opening paragraph， the author introduces his topic by
[A] posing a contrast.
[B] justifying an assumption.
[C] explaining a phenomenon.
[D] making a comparison.
2. The statement “I assume I would have known if either suffered from diabetes， but I can't swear to that.” (Line 4， Paragraph 3) implies that
[A] only one of them suffered from diabetes.
[B] neither of them suffered from diabetes.
[C] both of them suffered from diabetes.
[D] it's uncertain whether they suffered from diabetes or not.
3. Family health report is very important because
[A] you can be careful about some disease and keep fit.
[B] you are connected with your parents and your grandparents.
[C] many diseases are genetic and should be noticed.
[D] you should be considerate and care about your parents.
4. Dr. Richard Carmona suggests that
[A] you should present your doctor with a medical history.
[B] you should print out your family's medical history.
[C] you should gather your family's medical history.
[D] you should give thanks for everything that is going right.
5. What can we infer from the last paragraph?
[A] The software is fun enough.
[B] Family medical tree shouldn't be neglected.
[C] The software is not available anywhere.
[D] It is wor