1 / 4
文档名称:

2010年6月大学英语六级考试真题.doc

格式:doc   大小:36KB   页数:4页
下载后只包含 1 个 DOC 格式的文档,没有任何的图纸或源代码,查看文件列表

如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点这里二次下载

分享

预览

2010年6月大学英语六级考试真题.doc

上传人:xunlai783 2018/5/9 文件大小:36 KB

下载得到文件列表

2010年6月大学英语六级考试真题.doc

相关文档

文档介绍

文档介绍:2010年6月大学英语六级考试真题经典阅读
QUESTION: My ninth-grade art teacher doesn’t give any grade above 94% because, she says, “there’s always room for improvement.” In previous years, I earned a 99% and a 100%.There 94 I received this term does not reflect the hard work that I put into this course. Because of her “improvement” theory, I got a lower grade than I deserve. Is her grading philosophy ethical?
Answer: Your teacher’s grading system may be unwise, but it is not unethical. A teacher deserves wide latitude in selecting the method of grading that best promotes learning in her classroom; that is, after all, the prime function of grades. It is that her system conforms to school rules, you can’t fault her ethics.
You can criticize her methodology. A 100 need not imply that there is no possibility of improvement, only that a student pleted the course work. A ninth grader could get a well-earned 100 in English class but still have a way to go before she writes as well as Jane Austen. What’s more, grades are not only an educational device but are also part of a screening system to help assign kids to their next class or program. By capping her grades at 94 while most other teachers grades on a scale that tops out at 100, your teacher could jeopardize a student’s chance of getting a scholarship or getting into a top college.
What it is wrong to condemn her for is overlooking your hard work