文档介绍：中文摘要
我国《票据法》第十条否定票据无因性,捆绑票据关系和原因关系,要求票据必须要有真实的交易背景和债权债务背景,而且必须给付相对应的对价。《票据法》第十条有因性的规定与票据法理论相悖,与发达国家通行的票据立法也不符。《票据法》第十条有因性的规定在理论上存在瑕疵,在实践上无法操作,影响了票据的流通,限制了票据功能的发挥,阻碍了我国票据市场的发展。
第一章主要是对我国《票据法》第十条与票据无因性之间的冲突进行分析, 目的是在理论上论证《票据法》第十条的不合理。首先阐述票据无因性原则,说明票据分离原因关系和票据关系的必要和理由。其次,介绍《票据法》第十条产生的历史沿革,从中考察《票据法》第十条的局限。最后,对《票据法》第十条缺陷及争议进行分析论证,考察《票据法》第十条存在的问题。
第二章主要对《票据法》第十条第一款关于真实交易背景交易的规定进行论述,通过对规范体系、理论基础、缺陷问题的阐述,在理论和实践上对其进行分析,论证《票据法》第十条第一款关于真实交易背景规定的不合理不可行。最后对其提出立法建议。
第三章主要对《票据法》第十条第二款关于票据对价的规定进行论述,通过对规范体系、理论基础、缺陷问题的阐述,在理论和实践上对其进行分析,论证
《票据法》第十条第二款关于票据对价的规定不合理不可行。最后对其提出立法
建议。
关键词:无因性原因关系票据关系
中图分类号:D922——28
ABSTI认CT
According to Article X of The Law 0f Negotiable Instruments, the issuing, acceptance and transference of negotiable instruments ply with the principle of authenticity&creditability and be based on real transaction&. Through the link between negotiable instruments and real transaction, the relations and background relations are closely kinds of connection
are obviously a violation of principle of abstractness which is considered
as the basis of the traditional‘theory of negotiable instruments. The First chapter starts from the principle of abstractness,
discusses the issues between negotiable·.ins七rument焉rel a:tions and‘ 一 background relations. Then deeply analySes‘上he problems and defects of Article X to make a clear point that Article X is unreasonable accordlng to the theories of negotiable instruments.
The Second Chapter of this essay focuses on the regulatlon regulates real transaction analyzing its regulation system, theoretical basis and defects,.demonstrate the unreasoning and infeasibility in real transaction background theory. In the end of this
chapter, brings forward the LegislatiVe proposals.
The Third Chapter of this essay focuses on the regulation which regulates the consideration of instruments. By analyzing its regulation system, theoretical basis and defects, demonstrate the