文档介绍：摘 要
陪审制度是指法院依法吸收普通民众、非职业法官参加民事、行政以及刑事案件审理的一种司法制度。在现代法治社会,陪审制度作为公民、群众直接参与司法活动的民主形式和公民权利的保障机制,在众多国家受到高度的赞赏与青睐。我国的陪审制度具适用 l:的任意性、陪审员的相对确定性、职权的全面性等四个方面的特征,同时它在维护司法公正、发扬司法民主、完善司法监督、加强普法教育等方面存在着独特的价值功能。但我国陪审制度在立法和司法层面上存在诸多的缺陷,如现行立法对陪审制度的适用范围规定的非常狭窄(仅适用于第一审程序),陪审员也没有独立的法律地位,陪审制度在三大诉讼法中的法律表述混乱不一,法律没有对陪审员的资格条件、任期的长短、责任的大小、具体的职权、补助等问题作出相应的规定。目前,我国就陪审制度的保存或废除展开了较多的讨论,主要形成了三种观点,第一是废除论,第二是陪审团论,第三是保存完善论。前面两种观点的理由不充分,而且也不符合我国的实际情况,因而是不可取的。那么我国陪审制度的出路何在呢?正确的态度应该是在实践中不断采取措施加以完善。
关键词:陪审制度;价值;特点;保存:废除;陪审团;评析; 完善。
Abstract
Jury system refers to a judicial system that absorbs ordinary people, non—professional judges according to the laws to take part in the trial of civil,administrative and criminal modem society ruled by law, jury system is popular and hi曲ly praised in many countries as a democratic form and a guarantee system that citizens and people take part in judicial actions country’S jury system has such characteristics in four aspects as prehensive jury and SO on,in the mean time it plays function on maintaining judicial justice and democracy and consummating judicial practice our country’S
jury system has SO many defects on legislative and judicial
example,present legislation restricts the application of jury system It es very narrow。Then jurors don’t have independent legal positions,the formulations of jury system in the procedural law are worse,there are no formulations for jurors’qualification requirements terms,responsibility range,specific powers and jurors’ treatments present,there are lots of discussion about the abolishment and preservation of Chinese jury pieces of e is saying of is saying ofjurors.
The other is saying of preservation and former two
attitudes don’t have enough her do they match the real conditions of OUt"country So they Can’t be what is the outlet for our country jury system?The correct aRitude we should adopt iS to take