文档介绍：上海交通大学
硕士学位论文
城市规划技术标准的规范性研究
姓名:王皓
申请学位级别:硕士
专业:宪法与行政法
指导教师:朱芒
20091223
城市规划技术标准的规范效应研究

摘要

由于城市规划活动的特殊性,技术标准在规划活动中起着至关重要
的作用。城市规划技术标准,若从形式来判断,大部分城市规划技术标
准应被排除于法律规范之列。若从实质意义上的标准来判断,技术标准
是行政机关判断事实认定构成要件的根据,同时其也间接地对私人的权
利义务产生了影响。在审判中,其对事实状态起着证明的作用,对行政
行为是否合法有着规范的效力。
法院目前在城乡规划案件中对规划技术标准的审查主要是形式上的
审查。但是,由于司法工作人员审查能力的局限,以及对行政权的尊重,
还有审查成本的考虑,对技术标准进行实质性审查的力度非常的弱。我
国目前还无法对技术标准的制定程序进行司法审查。
在司法审判中,不同类型的规划技术标准之间,规划技术标准和其
他领域的标准存在着适用上的冲突,法官在选择这些标准的时候,要在
尊重行政机关判断能力的前提下,从区域的特殊性、保障公民权益的角
度出发来对冲突的标准进行选择,在发生技术标准冲突的时候应当以下
级规划部门标准优先、旧有标准优先、较高标准、国家标准优先的冲突
规则选择案件审理中所需要的技术标准。

关键词:城市规划,技术标准,规范效应,司法审判,适用

4
THE RESEARCH ON
THE FUNCTIONS OF TECHNICAL STANDARDS
IN THE CITY PLANNING FIELDS

ABSTRACT

The technical standards of city planning are playing an important role in the fields of
city planning. Under delegation test, publication test, external form test and procedure test,
technical standards should be excluded from the group of legal norms. But if based on
substantive standards, to consider whether technical standards have the legal force, it can
draw the conclusion that technical standards are important basis to determine facts by
administrative agencies, technical standards also indirectly prescribed the right and
obligation of private persons, so it external legl effects on private persons. If legal norms
should be norms used in the court, then the facts determined by technical standards should
be evidence in judicial review. Though technical standards don’t have the form of legal
norms, but it exerts the same function and effects
Due to plexity of technical issues, the judges should not use their own
judgments to substitute for judgments by administrative agencies. Though courts are
considered as experts on procedural matters but not on substantive matters, but now in
china it can’t carry out judicial review on technical standards-setting procedure.
The technical standards can