1 / 4
文档名称:

腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗子宫癌临床效果对比.doc

格式:doc   大小:71KB   页数:4页
下载后只包含 1 个 DOC 格式的文档,没有任何的图纸或源代码,查看文件列表

如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点这里二次下载

分享

预览

腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗子宫癌临床效果对比.doc

上传人:pppccc8 2018/10/17 文件大小:71 KB

下载得到文件列表

腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗子宫癌临床效果对比.doc

相关文档

文档介绍

文档介绍:腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗子宫癌临床效果对比
青文婕
(成都市妇女儿童中心医院妇产科四川成都610031)
【】目的:对腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗子宫癌临床效果进行研宄比较。
方法:把50例子宫癌患者分成研究组和对照组,每组患者25例,研究组行腹腔镜手术,对照组行开腹手术,对两组患者的术后临床疗效分析对比。结果:研宄组手术时间、术中出血量、肛门排气时间、住院时间相比对照组更低(P<); %%明显更低,数据差异具有统计学意义(P<)。结论:腹腔镜手术治疗子宫癌临床效果更好,值得推广。
【关键词】腹腔镜;子宫癌;临床疗效
【】【】A【】2095-1752 (2015)
14-0200-02
Comparative clinical effectiveness between laparoscopic and open surgery for
uterine cancer
ding Wenjie Gynaecology and obstetrics of Chengdu Women’s &
Children’s Central HospitalChengdu,Sichuan610031,China
[Abstract] pare the clinical effects between laparoscopic and
open surgery for uterine cancer. MethodsDivide 50 cases of uterine cancer patients
into the study group and the control group, 25 patients in each group, the study
group underwent laparoscopic surgery,the control group underwent open surgery,
the clinical efficacy of the two groups were analyzed pared. ResultsStudy
group’s operative time, blood loss, flatus and length of stay is lower than the control group (P<) ;The incidence of adverse reactions % in the study group
was significantly lower than % in the control group, the data was statistically significant differences (P <). ConclusionLaparoscopic treatment of uterine
cancer is better, worthy of promotion.
【Key words】 Laparoscopic; Uterine cancer; Clinical efficacy 本次研宄随机选取2013年9月〜2