文档介绍：Tailor-made finance versus tailor-made service
Can the state improve consumer choice in healthcare by reforming the financial structure?
Kor Grit & te de Bont
Institute of Health Policy & Management
ErasmusMC/ Erasmus University Rotterdam
Corresponding author:
Kor Grit
Institute of Health Policy & Management
ErasmusMC/ Erasmus University Rotterdam
Postbox 1738
3000 DR Rotterdam
herlands
+ 31 10 4088579
k.******@
Keywords: Choice behavior, individual budgets, distributive justice, long term care
Word count: 3446
ABSTRACT
Background: Policy instruments based on the working of markets have been introduced to empower consumers of healthcare, however it is not easy to e a critical consumer in healthcare.
Objectives: The aim of this study is to analyze the possibilities of the state to strengthen the influence of patients with the aid of a new financial regime, such as personal health budgets.
Methods: Data were collected through in-depth interviews with executives, managers, professionals and client representatives of six long-term care institutions.
Results: Introducing individual budgets implies that the responsibility for budgetary control is shifted from anizational level to the individual level of the caregiver-client relation. Offering more luxurious care necessitates a stronger demarcation of standard care anizations cannot simultaneously offer extra care part of regularly care. Hence, new financial instruments influence the culture of care receiving and giving. Distributive justice takes on new meaning with the introduction of financial market mechanisms in healthcare; the distributing principle of ‘need’ is transformed into the principle of ‘economic demand’.
Conclusion: Financial instruments acted not only as a countervailing power against that are not client-oriented enough, but were also used by providers to reinforce their own position vis-à-vis demanding clients. Tailor-made finance is not the same as tailor-made care.
Intr