1 / 37
文档名称:

滥用职权罪探究.pdf

格式:pdf   页数:37页
下载后只包含 1 个 PDF 格式的文档,没有任何的图纸或源代码,查看文件列表

如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点这里二次下载

分享

预览

滥用职权罪探究.pdf

上传人:beny00011 2015/10/9 文件大小:0 KB

下载得到文件列表

滥用职权罪探究.pdf

相关文档

文档介绍

文档介绍:摘要
摘要
滥用职权罪在刑法中规定的比较简单,但实践中发生的滥用职权行为本身却具有复
杂性,在司法认定过程中产生了许多问题,很多争议问题并未达成一致的意见,这给滥
用职权罪的适用产生了极大的障碍。
滥用职权罪适用中的问题主要集中在犯罪构成要件的认定方面。滥用职权罪的客体
应为复杂客体,包括国家机关的正常管理活动以及公共利益;滥用职权罪的行为既包括
作为,也包括不作为;滥用职权罪中的“重大损失”包含了人身损害、财产损失,以及
“社会影响”这种非物质性的损失。滥用职权罪的主观方面表现为故意。滥用职权罪的
主体为国家机关工作人员,包括了在国家机关中从事公务的人员、在行使国家行政管理
职权的组织中从事公务的人员以及党政机关中从事公务的人员。而非国家机关工作人员
与国家机关工作人员,能构成滥用职权罪的实行共犯。
滥用职权罪与一般滥用职权行为、官僚主义最主要的区别在于,后两者客观上造成
不了刑法上“重大损失”的结果。而滥用职权罪与工作失误最大的区别在于,工作失误
的行为人并不希望“重大损失”结果的发生。玩忽职守罪与滥用职权罪的区别在于主观
方面,即玩忽职守罪为过失犯。而玩忽职守罪与受贿罪的区别在于客体不同,受贿罪的
客体是国家工作人员职务行为的廉洁性。滥用职权罪与受贿罪发生竞合时应数罪并罚。

关键词滥用职权罪构成要件特殊形态
I
Abstract
Abstract
Crime of power abuse provisions in the criminal law is relatively simple, but the behavior
of power abuse occur in practice itself plexity and had generated a lot of difficult
problems in the judicial recognition process, a lot of controversial issues did not reach a
consensus .
The problems of the crime of power abuse in applies are mainly concentrated in the
crime constitution. The object of crime of power abuse should be plex object, including
the normal management activities of ans and public interests ;Behavior of the crime
of power abuse Include the acts and omissions ; The "significant loss" of the crime of power
abuse includes personal injury, property damage, as well as "social impact" of such
non-material losses. Subjective of the crime of power abuse is deliberate. The main body of
crime of power abuse is staff of ans, including ans engaged in public service
in the personnel engaged in the exercise of official duties in anization in terms of state
administration staff and government agencies engaged in official business. The staff of
non-anization and ans can be constituted the crime of power abuse
to implement as an plice.
The crime of power abuse and general abuses, the main difference lies in the bureaucracy,
the latter two on the criminal law can not objectively cause the results "significant loss". The
bigge