文档介绍：Forpersonaluseonlyinstudyandresearch;mercialuse论老子的“常道”和“非常道”小蕊(黑龙江大学####学院,黑龙江哈尔滨#####)摘要:《老子》自成书以来,存在着很多不同的解析方向。道教强调其养生,儒生强调其玄学,近代学人则强调其哲学观念,企业家又强调其管理精髓,就连普通大众都能够从中找到其处世依据。可以说对《老子》的解析泛而滥之。但无论各家对其解释如何,最终总归很难自圆其说。探其根由,在于众人皆在“功利主义”的操纵下对其进行解析,而并没有去探求其根本实质,尤其是没有弄清“常道”和“非常道”之间的关系。为此,本论文着重解析“常道”与“非常道”,并在其基础上对他们与人之间的关系,及其求“常道”与完善“非常道”的目的与注意点。关键词:常道;非常道,求常道,完善非常道ThetheoryofLaotzu's"Eternaltruth"and"Temporaryright"Smallcore(####instituteofheilongjianguniversity,Harbininheilongjiangprovince#####)Abstract:"Laotzu"sinceitsbooks,,Confucianscholarsemphasizeitsmetaphysics,modernscholarsemphasizeitsphilosophicalideas,entrepreneursandemphasizeitsmanagementessence,evenordinarypeoplecanfinditsbasisinone'"Laotzu",,themainreasonisthatallpeopleunderthemanipulationof"utilitarianism"toparse,anddidnotgotoexploretheunderlyingsubstance,especiallythereisnoclear"Eternaltruth"andtherelationshipbetween"Temporaryright".Forthisreason,thispaperfocusesonparsing"Eternaltruth"and"Temporaryright",andonthebasisofthemandtherelationshipbetweenthepeople,andtheline"Eternaltruth"and"Temporaryright":often;"Eternaltruth";"Temporaryright",Practicethetruth正确的学术观应该是尽可能的去还原原著者写书的意图,而不应该是根据注释者本身的需要妄加解析,甚至是肆意篡改著者的