文档介绍：arXiv:quant-ph/0509019 v1 2 Sep 2005
eateto hsc,Uiest fPta,250Patras, 26500 Patras, of University Physics, of Department
lsia sQatmPoaiiyi Sequential in Probability Quantum Vs Classical
∗
mi:******@ Email:
mna eut eaiigi atclrte”hc a”ex way” principle. in ”which distinguishable the however, e particular by are, out in they ruled (examining not converge) are results not hypothesis imental do this of frequencies predictions event the (the that defined p always empirical be the contextual not that s removes implies not This but does non-locality, that probability. th introducing process of proposal a by axioms alternative no modelled Kolmogorov an does be examine can however, measurements finally mechanics, tial We Bohmian measuring category. the account. this of into freedom sequ taken of variabl for degrees are hidden theory the quantum when local of even that surements, predictions prove the i next reproduce defined We cannot W the naturally examine be operator. theory. then cannot frequency quantum We probabilities of multi-time environment. interpretations that an alternative of in m mechanical presence issues quantum the a device consider or measurement we device the if even of persists resolution that the sion const on the strongly spectrum, continuous depend with observables co For su We provide ities. determined. that are (POVM) measures they on stochas Positive-Operator-Valued which strongly classical through depend a they scheme by namely measurement modelled contextual, are be they cannot single- Second, they of those First, from ments. different very features have surements
edmntaei hspprta h rbblte o sequ for probabilities the that paper this in demonstrate We
hrsAatpuo , Anastopoulos Charis
Measurements
a 9 2006 29, May
Abstract
1
oaiiiscan- robabilities
utdPOVMs ructed
iemeasure- time
itn exper- xisting
em fa of terms n
hprobabil- ch
rtshow first e
t without ity
periments);
easurement process. tic