1 / 50
文档名称:

腹针治疗混合痔术后疼痛的临床的研究.pdf

格式:pdf   页数:50
下载后只包含 1 个 PDF 格式的文档,没有任何的图纸或源代码,查看文件列表

如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点这里二次下载

分享

预览

腹针治疗混合痔术后疼痛的临床的研究.pdf

上传人:459972402 2016/1/16 文件大小:0 KB

下载得到文件列表

腹针治疗混合痔术后疼痛的临床的研究.pdf

文档介绍

文档介绍:中文摘要??????????????????????????б???????????????????????ь???????????σ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????б?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????5????????????????????????????????б??????????б??????????????б???????????б?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????ν??????????????????????????????????6ABSTRACT Objective: In order to seek for one kind of economical practical plan of analgesic effect ideal, adverse reaction to be small, the operation to be simple. To observe the analgesic effect about abdominal needle treatment mixed hemorrboids after operation . Methods: After selection mixed hemorrboids after operation, the ache 60 examples, we divided into the group abdominal needle treatment and anodyne tablets, each group had 30 patients. Abdominal needle treatment group:acupuncture was given at main points,Zhongwan(shallo wneedling),Qihai(deep needing),Guanyuan(deep needing). Auxiliaryacupuncture point wae Shuifen(shallow needing).Assistance acupuncture point were Fengshidian under Qihai(shallow needing) and Tianshu(middle needing). Anodyne tablets group:oral ,two the visual analog scale(VAS) to evaluate the ache ,we observed two group of pain degree and the analgesic effect in 23 hours then plication and adverse reaction after operation. 7Results: Analgesic effect between tuo groups ,the VAS score of each patient was recorded at 1, 3, 5 hrs(P<); the VAS score of each patient was recorded at 7,11, 23 hrs(P<). the urinary retention was observed(P<). the anal margin edema was observed(P<). Compari