文档介绍：摘要摘要公诉裁量权是检察机关的一项重要权利,在我国刑事诉讼法中具有重要作用。笔者认为公诉裁量的定义应该界定为检察机关对公诉案件是否起诉,起诉的运作形式、起诉后的变更以及量刑建议的权利。文章对公诉裁量权的运作形式、特征、法理基础、基本原则、价值等做了具体的分析。紧接着介绍了日本、德国、美国以及英国的公诉裁量权,对国外的公诉裁量权的考察有利于吸取国外公诉裁量权的合理部分,从而完善我国的公诉裁量权。我国公裁量权存在一些问题,比如不起诉适用率较低,使用方式单一,量刑建议制度没能得到有效的发挥,公诉转自诉上也存在一定的问题,缺少公诉制约机制。面对这些问题, 我国部分检察机关在实践中推出了辩诉交易、暂缓起诉以及量刑建议等改革措施。但是这些措施突破了我国公诉裁量权法律规定的空间。基于此,笔者提出了一些措施来完善我国的公诉裁量权,比如扩大我国的公诉裁量权的适用范围, 完善附条件不起诉,同时对量刑建议的内容、形式和程序、公诉变更以及监督方面都做出了详细规定,最后希望本文能为我国公诉裁量权的完善做出一份贡献。关键词:公诉裁量权;起诉便宜主义;量刑建议;附条件不起诉 Abstract ABSTRACT Discretion power of public prosecution is an important right of public prosecution,it playsanimportant roleinthecriminalprocedure lawinOurcountry. The author thinks that the definition ofpublic prosecution discretion should be defined aswhether thepublic prosecution indictment,theprosecution changes after operation form,prosecution second part of the articledoesthe concrete analysis totheperformance ofpublicprosecution discretion theforms,features,legalbasis,and basicprinciples,values, the article introduces theJapan,Germany,the United States and Britain’Spublic prosecution discretion,on the investigation tothe discretion ofpublic prosecution abroad is beneficial toabsorb othercountries’reasonable part,SO as toperfect our country’S public prosecution apply rate of not prosecution discretion islow, sentencing suggestion system Can’teffectively play,private prosecution indictment alsohascertainproblem,the lackofpublic prosecution the face oftheseproblems,part ofthepublic prosecution inChina launched aplea bargain inpractice,deferred prosecution and sentencing suggestion to reform ofthesepractices break the lawsandregulations of ourcountry’S public prosecution on this,the author puts forwardsome measures toperfectOurcountry’S publicprosecution discretion,such asexpansion ofdiscretion ofpublic prosecution inOurcountry,for China’Snew criminal procedure law for conditional furtherputsforw