文档介绍：摘要摘要量刑规范化改革是实现量刑公正、维护社会公平正义的必然要求,是规范法官的自由裁量权、统一量刑尺度的重要保证,是树立司法公信力和司法权威的重大举措。在我国进行量刑规范化的改革势在必行。虽然在全国法院试行的刑事案件量刑规范化的改革进一步规范了量刑活动,但我们应该认识到仍然存在的量刑失衡、量刑结论缺乏公信力等现象。对量刑规范化的改革进行探讨,要选择适合中国现实情况的量刑规范化路径, 通过实体和程序两种路径切入。在实体路径方面,考虑制定统一的量刑指导规则, 来规范法官的自由裁量权;在现行司法体制内建立案例指导制度,与量刑规范化改革有内在的契合性。从实体上的进路来达到规范化量刑的目的虽然立竿见影,能在短时间内收到成效,但实体路径在逻辑上有一定的局限性,受到较大的限制,难以无顾虑的展开。在程序正义的保障作用日益凸显的当下,量刑的实体正义更需要通过程序的正义来保驾护航,程序进路的完善成为量刑规范化的主要路径。最高人民法院关于《规范量刑程序若干问题的意见(试行)》没有具体论述如何在法庭调查和审理阶段构建相对独立的量刑程序,可以在现有审理程序的基础上,通过完善审前、审中、审后三个阶段的程序,使量刑程序发挥更大的作用,解决量刑失衡的问题。关键词:量刑规范化改革,实体路径,程序路径 Abstract Abstract Sentencing reform istheinevitable requirement toachieve thejustice ofsentencing, mmmain social ;Sentencing reform is an important guarantee to regulate the discretion ofthe judge,to uniformsentencing scale,and itis themajor step toestablishthecredibilityofjustice andjudicial China,Carry outthe standardizedsentencing reform thenationwidesentencing reform inthecriminal oases court trialstandardized sentencing activitiesfurther,we should recognize thatstill existsentencing imbalance,lacks ofcredibility insentencing conclusion and SO on. We should choose suitablepath todiscussthereformofsentencing standardization. The substantive andprocedural paths which aretheappropriate way tocutthisproblem. Intheentity path,we considermaking aunifiedsentencingguidance toregulate the the current judicial system,we established within case guidance system withan inner sentencing standardization reformcorrespondence. Although the approach from theentity to achieve thepurpose ofstandardization sentencing isimmediate in ashorttime,but theentitypath inlogic hasitslimitations, subjects togreater restrictions,it isdifficult tounfold intheprotection of procedural justice e increasinglyprominent inthemoment,more substantive justicesentencing procedures need toprotectjustice,procedural approaches perfection as themainpath ofstandardized sentencing. The supr