文档介绍：摘要摘要人类对隐喻的研究已经有2000多年的历史,然而,直到1980年Lakoff,G. 和Johnson,,国内外学者才开始从认知的角度研究隐喻, 认为隐喻不再只是一种修辞手段,它与人们的思维活动密切相关。从本质上说, 隐喻是在相似性的基础上,从一个认知域向另外一个认知域的映射。它涉及人类感情、思想和行为的表达方式在不同但相关领域间的转换生成,是人类认知和思维的工具。作为认知和思维的工具,隐喻将现实世界与人类认知联系起来,并表现在语言中,无论是从词汇和句子层面来看,还是从语法层面来看,人类语言中都有隐喻的足迹。可谓隐喻无处不在。人类在认识世界时总是以身体为经验,所谓“近取诸身,远取诸物”。眼作为视觉器官,是人类获取信息的主要渠道之一,也是人类认知主客观世界活动的起点。随着人们对“眼”自身功能性质的认识加深,经过隐喻必然会形成许多隐喻表达。本文受认知隐喻学多维跨域阐释的启发,首先从词汇层面考察汉英“眼”所涉及的实体隐喻,其次根据“眼”与其他词语在句子层面产生的语义冲突来考察汉英“眼”所涉及的结构隐喻,再通过分析有关“眼”的句子所表达的各种语义过程之间的转换来考察与“眼”有关的语法隐喻现象。前三章侧重于描写解释汉英“眼”共同涉及的隐喻类别以及每一类别下面汉英“眼”隐喻的差异之处, 当然在描写解释的行文过程中也产生了一些疑问:汉英“眼”隐喻在词汇表达以及隐喻映射上有哪些异同点?汉英“眼”隐喻有哪些认知上的共性特点?与“眼”有关的语法隐喻在词汇语法层都涉及到了“眼”词性的变化,那么汉英“眼”词性转化的认知机制是什么?所以,最后先以图表的形式对比呈现了汉英“眼”隐喻在词汇表达方面以及基于“眼”各方面特点的隐喻映射异同点,并从中总结了汉英“眼”隐喻在认知上的共性特点,最后梳理了汉英“眼”词性变化的认知机制。关键词: 眼,Eye,隐喻认知,多维跨域 Abstract Abstract The research ofmetaphor began more than 2000 years ago,however,since bination of cognition and metaphor made by Lakoff,G:&Johnson, 980,scholars athome and abroad have begun tostudymetaphor from conceptual views and havefound thatmetaphor istightly related with our mind ratherthan a rhetorical essence,metaphor iscross-domain mapping from thesource domain tothetarget domain based on thesimilarity oftwo is akind of toolof our mind and cognition related withthetransitionandgeneration ofdifferent expression about human being’S emotion,mind and behavior indifferentbutrelated atoolofthinking,metaphor relatesthe world withOurcognition,which isreflected in our languages,SO metaphor isuniversal inwords,sentences and grammars. Man begins tO know the world by firstknowing hisbody,just as the saying “basing on ourselves and thefamiliar,we know theabstract and unfamiliar.’’Asthe an,eye is notonly themain approach ofgetting messages butalso can be treated as the start we know more about thefunction and attribution ofeye,many metaphorical expressions are by themultidimensional and cross—spherical study ofcognitive metap