1 / 12
文档名称:

中医治疗干眼病的方法和临床效果.doc

格式:doc   大小:24KB   页数:12页
下载后只包含 1 个 DOC 格式的文档,没有任何的图纸或源代码,查看文件列表

如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点这里二次下载

分享

预览

中医治疗干眼病的方法和临床效果.doc

上传人:w8888u 2020/12/17 文件大小:24 KB

下载得到文件列表

中医治疗干眼病的方法和临床效果.doc

相关文档

文档介绍

文档介绍:中医治疗干眼病的方法和临床效果


该论文来源于网络,本站转载的论文均是优质论文,供学****和研究使用,文中立场与本网站无关,版权和著作权归原作者所有,如有不愿意被转载的情况,请通知我们删除已转载的信息,如果需要分享,请保留本段说明。
  【摘要】 目的:探讨中医治疗干眼病的方法和临床效果。方法:回顾性选取2017年1月-2019年12月笔者所在医院收治的干眼病患者60例(120眼),依据治疗方法分为中药内服联合超声雾化治疗组(研究组,n=30,60眼)和爱丽滴眼液治疗组(对照组,n=30,60眼),统计分析两组症状评分、FL评分、SIt、BUT、临床疗效。结果:治疗前两组症状评分、FL评分、SIt、BUT比较差异无统计学意义(P>),治疗后研究组症状评分、FL评分均低于对照组,SIt、BUT均高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<)。%(29/30),%(22/30),差异有统计学意义(P<)。结论:干眼病中药内服联合超声雾化治疗临床效果优于爱丽滴眼液治疗。
   【关键词】 干眼病 中药内服 超声雾化 爱丽滴眼液 症状评分
   doi:. 文献标识码 B 文章编号 1674-6805(2020)20-0-02
   Methods and Clinical Effect of Treating Dry Eye Disease with Traditional Chinese Medicine/LUO Qiuping, XU Junyong, GUO Jingxin. //Chinese and Foreign Medical Research, 2020, 18(20): -137
   [Abstract] Objective: To explore the methods and clinical effect of traditional Chinese medicine for dry eye disease. Method: A total of 60 cases (120 eyes) with dry eye disease in our hospital from January 2017 to December 2019 were retrospectively selected. According to the treatment methods, they were divided into the Chinese medicine orally taken in combination with ultrasonic atomization treatment group (study group, n=30, 60 eyes) and the Aili eye drops treatment group (control group, n=30, 60 eyes). The symptom score, FL score, SIt, BUT and clinical efficacy of the two groups were statistically analyzed. Result: Before treatment, there were no statistically significant differences in symptom score, FL score, SIt and BUT between the two groups (P>). After treatment, the symptom score and FL score in the study group were lower than those in the control group, the SIt and BUT in the study group were lower than those in the control group, the differences were statistically significant (P<). The total effective rate of treatment in the study group was % (29/30), higher than % (22/30) in the control group, the difference was statistica