1 / 54
文档名称:

《GRE作文20篇范文.》.doc.doc

格式:doc   页数:54页
下载后只包含 1 个 DOC 格式的文档,没有任何的图纸或源代码,查看文件列表

如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点这里二次下载

分享

预览

《GRE作文20篇范文.》.doc.doc

上传人:755273190 2016/5/12 文件大小:0 KB

下载得到文件列表

《GRE作文20篇范文.》.doc.doc

相关文档

文档介绍

文档介绍:孙远 20 篇范文 GRE ISSUE 范文 1 [Topic] "The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished." [Sample Essay] The intensity of today's media coverage has been greatly magnified by the sheer number and types of media outlets that are available today. petition for the most revealing photographs and the latest information on a subject has turned even minor media events into so-called "media frenzies". Reporters are forced by the nature of petition to pry ever deeper for an angle on a story that no one else has been able to uncover. With this type of media coverage, it does e more and more likely that anyone who is subjected to it will have his or her reputation tarnished, as no individual is perfect. Everyone makes mistakes. The advances in technology have made much information easily and instantaneously available. Technology has also made it easier to dig further than ever before into a person's past, increasing the possibility that the subject's reputation may be harmed. The above statement is much too broad, however. "Anyone" covers all people all over the world. There are people whose reputations have only been enhanced by media scrutiny. There are also people whose reputations were already so poor that media scrutiny could not possibly diminish it any further. There may very well be people that have done nothing wrong in the past, at least that can be discovered by the media, whose reputations could not be diminished by media scrutiny. To broadly state that "anyone" subjected to media coverage will have his or her status sullied implies that everyone's reputation worldwide is susceptible to damage under any type of media scrutiny. What about children, particularly newborn children? What about those people whose past is entirely unknown? Another problem with such a broad statement is that it does not define the particular level of media scrutiny. Certainly there are different levels of media coverage. Does merely the mention of one's