文档介绍：Multiple Testing and
Prediction and Variable Selection
Class web site: http://statison/teaching/Microarrays/
Statistics for Microarrays
cDNA gene expression data
Data on G genes for n samples
Genes
mRNA samples
Gene expression level of gene i in mRNA sample j
=
(normalized) Log( Red intensity / Green intensity)
sample1 sample2 sample3 sample4 sample5 …
1 ...
2 - ...
3 ...
4 - - - - - ...
5 - - ...
Multiple Testing Problem
Simultaneously test G null hypotheses, one for each gene j
Hj: no association between expression level of gene j and the covariate or response
Because microarray experiments simultaneously monitor expression levels of thousands of genes, there is a large multiplicity issue
Would like some sense of how ‘surprising’ the observed results are
Hypothesis Truth vs. Decision
# not rejected
# rejected
totals
# true H
U
V (F +)
m0
# non-true H
T
S
m1
totals
m - R
R
m
Truth
Decision
Type I (False Positive) Error Rates
Per-family Error Rate
PFER = E(V)
parison Error Rate
PCER = E(V)/m
Family-wise Error Rate
FWER = p(V ≥ 1)
False Discovery Rate
FDR = E(Q), where
Q = V/R if R > 0; Q = 0 if R = 0
Strong vs. Weak Control
All probabilities are conditional on which hypotheses are true
Strong control refers to control of the Type I error rate under bination of true and false nulls
Weak control refers to control of the Type I error rate only under plete null hypothesis (. all nulls true)
In general, weak control without other safeguards is unsatisfactory
Comparison of Type I Error Rates
In general, for a given multiple testing procedure,
PCER FWER PFER,
and
FDR FWER,
with FDR = FWER under plete null
Adjusted p-values (p*)
If interest is in controlling, ., the FWER, the adjusted p-value for hypothesis Hj is:
pj* = inf {: Hj is rejected at FWER }
Hypothesis Hj is rejected at FWER if pj*
Adju