文档介绍：内容提要本论文是关于建安文学的专题研究。第一章、第二章主要是以论题为纲、以相关批评为目,对古人留下的建安文学批评资料进行有针对性的清理。如在所谓“建安体”的论题下,将古人的相关批评整合在一起,藉此可以加深今人对建安文学特色的认识。第三章是对二十世纪的建安文学研究所作的评述,旨在尽量全面地展示这一百年来的重要的、有代表性的研究成果,作者的按断时不时掺杂其间。第四章论述曹操与建安诸文士之间的关系。认为限于种种原因,曹操不会重视,更不会藿用建安诸文士。诸文士志不得伸的不平之鸣,成为建安时期文学的一项重要内容。第五章、第六章探讨曹氏兄弟争嗣本末及其影响的问题,深化了学术界对这一问题的认识,并提出一些新的见解。如曹氏兄弟争嗣始于建安十六年(211) 以后,丁仪、丁虞比杨修对曹丕的危害更大等。关键词:建安文学专题研究分类号: ABSTRACT The dissertation is amonographic study ofJian’anliterature. Taking topics as‘‘thehead rope”and criticism relative tothem as “themeshes”.chapter 1and 2 are supposed toarrange thecritical data aboutJian’an literatureIeft over by the topic ofSO—called“Jian’”.the ancients’criticism relative toitiS puttogether,by which contemporaries can have adeep understanding of haracteristicsofJian’an literature. Chapter 3iS areview ofthestudy ofJian’anliterature inthe 20t11 century intending todisplay theimportant andtypical study achievements prehensively author’S own opinions appear in the review timeand timeagain. Chapter 4discusses therelationbetween Caocao andJian’an literati. It’S theauthor’Sviewpoint that due tosome reasons,Caocao could not attach much importance toJian’an literati,could not put them in important positions ’all literati’Selegies caused by theirlofry aspirations unrealized are an ponent oftheliterature in Jian’anperiod, Chapter 5and 6focus on the event thatCaopi and Caozhi vied for the status e acrown prince;probe intothe whole story from beginning toend,and it’Sgreat influence as new views are put forward。For instance,the event came intobeing after21lAD;To Caopi,the more frightful threat isDingyi(for“丁仪”)andDingyi(for“丁虞”)but notYangxiu,etc. Keywords: Jian’anliterature Monographic study 引言在中国文学史上,建安文学的块头并不大,但响当当、沉甸甸。建安是东汉献帝刘协的年号,而建安文学不仅涵盖建安时期(196—220),还至少向上追溯到汉灵帝中平元年(184),向下延续到魏明帝太和六年(232),大约有半个世纪之久,在时间断限上比较特殊。这一点还有得比,如所谓正始(魏齐王曹芳的年号)文学,也不仅仅是限于正始时期(240—248)。建安文学最为特殊的,是它在文学史分期上,总是被视为曹魏文学而不是东汉文学。这一点正始文学就没得比了,它总是被视为曹魏文学而不是西