文档介绍：摘要关于盗窃罪的犯罪对象,长期以来,是我阁刑法联论界有争议的问题之一。众多专家学者偻藻国内终刑法璞论并结会司法实践,形成了“持有可能谈”、“效羯说”、“肖体性说”、“管理可能说”等等诸多学说。近年来,随着我社会市场经济主粤遣盈鹣麓立帮辩技的寒速发嶷,掰煮铡形式囊单一变为复杂,投裂载传也蜀趋多样化,传统有关盗窃罪犯罪对象的理论在指搏新出现的盗窃犯罪疑难案件时箍漆藿巨大熬揍战,盗褒嚣握嚣砖象认定黥理论羹霉毒进一疹曼瑟秘完善。在论文第一部分,作者从引述国外的“本权说”和“占有说”入手,对比论证了国内癸有关盗窃嚣犯罪客镩理论秘霹法实黢方嚣豹异嚣之楚,撬蹬这些攀说争谂豹焦点在于对盗窃他人非法占有物的犯罪对象属性的认定。其后作者从对该认定问题研究审争论最为集串静搿有救和占膏农舞个方蘑避努了深入瓣论证,指出盗窃罪侵占的对象不是所有权,而是占有权,从而进~步提出区别于传统“占肖说”的“以{}法占有为霹戆”静“薪占有说”。并捂磁,作为筑窃罪瓷罪对象熬占有怒~伞事实上的概念,即对事物的枣实上的持有支配,它隧别于民法上占有的概念。在论文第二部分,作者在对眈论诞国内井涮法理论帮司法实践的同时,依据作者提出的“新占有说”,详细论证了盗窃罪犯嚣对象所成具有的六个基本特征,即交换价德属性;能够被入所控制、占有或者支配;其裔可移动往;狠嚣对象的酱通性和例外性;为他人所占有;符合立法精神。这六个特征的归纳对识别行为人是否犯盗窃罪以及对其含理量刑都具有麓要的指导意义。在本论文第三部分,作者列举了避年来我湖司法灾践中出现的疑难和有争议的案例,结合国内外刑法理论,并依据“新占有说’,和盗窃罪犯罪对象所戚其有的六个基本特征,谨缨论遁了盗窃不动产能秀构成滋窃罪、盗寝非法持有物能否构戏盗窃罪、盗窃光形能源能否构成盗窃罪、盗窃电子货币资金能否构成盗窃罪、盗宏技术戏暴及≤#法拷贝软盘憩黉构残盗窃罪、滚窃电蕊鼹务熊孬麴成盗密罪、滋窃网络虚拟财产能否构成盗窃释等问蹶。这些盗窃疑难问题的辨析对进一步丰富我国囊法学雾瓷窃狂嚣瓣象理谂,搔导霉法极荧办理豢传都其鸯耋要懿豢义。关键词:泼窃罪犯罪对象占有 Abstract The criminalobjects oflarceny is adisputed question in along period among nativecriminal refered toforeign andnativecriminaltheories, combined withjudiciary practice,have formed such theories as Holdable PossibiHty, EffectTheory,TengibiHty,Managable Possibility,ere.。But withthemarketed economic system established inChinaand electronic technology booming,different ownerships and rights fundaments varying,the traditionaltheory forcriminalobjects oflarceny is facing tremendous challenges inguiding theJudiciary toresolvedifficult cases. Inthefirstpart ofthesis,the author citedforeign“InherentRightsTheory'’and “Possess Theory'’pare tonative theories about c矗minal objects oflarceny, pointed out the focus discussed ishow tOdefine stealing others illegallypossessing ,the author demonstrated from themost disputed question whether ownership or possessing rights,pointed out thatthecriminalobjects oflarceny isn’t ownership but possessing rights,SO released the New Possessing Theory which differentiate pointed out,thepossessing is areal