文档介绍：CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members mittees of Congress The SPEECH Act: The Federal Response to “Libel Tourism” Emily C. Barbour Legislative Attorney September 16, 2010 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 R41417 The SPEECH Act: The Federal Response to “Libel Tourism” Congressional Research Service Summary The 111 th Congress considered several bills addressing “libel tourism,” the phenomenon of litigants bringing libel suits in foreign jurisdictions so as to benefit from plaintiff-friendly libel laws. Several . states have also responded to libel tourism by enacting statutes that restrict enforcement of foreign libel judgments. On August 10, 2010, President Barack Obama signed into law the Securing the Protection of our Enduring and Established Constitutional Heritage Act (SPEECH Act), . 111-223, codified at 28 . §§ 4101-4105, which bars . courts, both state and federal, from recognizing or enforcing a foreign judgment for defamation unless certain requirements, including consistency with the . Constitution and section 230 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 . § 230), are satisfied. Although the SPEECH Act does not have an express preemption provision, it appears designed to preempt state laws on foreign libel judgments. It explicitly applies to all “domestic” courts, which it defines to include state courts notwithstanding contrary state law. Moreover, its legislative history suggests that Congress perceived a need for, and understood the SPEECH Act as establishing, a single uniform approach to the problem of foreign libel judgments against . persons. The SPEECH Act may, however, implicate aspects of ity. One concern is that foreign countries may opt to decline to enforce . libel judgments or e less receptive to calls for enforcement of . judgments in legal areas in which . law is perceived as relatively friendly to plaintiffs. The SPEECH Act: The Federal Response to “Libel Tourism” Congr