文档介绍：I 摘要徇私枉法罪作为一种严重的职务犯罪,其犯罪主体具有极大地特殊性,实施枉法追诉或者枉法裁判的行为,往往会激化社会矛盾,不利于社会的稳定与发展。它破坏了正常的法律秩序,侵犯了他人的合法权益,玷污了法律在人民大众中的光辉形象,有损国家机关和国家工作人员的良好形象,降低了人民大众对国家机关的信任度。由于社会的复杂性及犯罪主体的特殊性,对本罪的理解存在诸多的争议,导致在司法实践中遇到很多的困难。本文在对本罪的分析研究方面采用了历史、实证、及比较的方法,以期能够对本罪有一个全面的理解,希望能够达到对司法实践有一定帮助的目的。本文从四个方面入手,第一部分阐述了徇私枉法罪的历史演变与国外的立法情况。第二部分重点介绍了本罪的犯罪构成,主要是从犯罪构成的四个要件入手。本文的第三部分则阐述了徇私枉法罪在司法实践中的司法认定问题,对一些司法实践问题进行了初步的探讨。最后一部分主要是针对徇私枉法罪的发案原因,在预防机制方面提出了一些建设性的解决措施,以期能够对我国的司法工作质量的提高有所帮助。关键词: 概述犯罪构成司法认定预防机制 II Abstract Favoritism as a serious crime of mitted, the subject of crime has greatly particularity, prosecution capricious and ar bitrary implementation of bending the law , tend to intensify social contradictions .Not c onducive to social stability and development. It undermines the normal legal order, violated the legal rights of othe rs, and tarnished the masses of the people in the law in the glorious image. Detrimental to the national authorities and the national staff of the good image, reduced masses of the people's trust in state institutions. As the plexity and particularity of the subject of crime, there are many disputes on understanding of the crime ,result in judicial practice, many difficulties encountered. In this paper, the analysis of the crime of research using historical, empirical, and th parative method, in order to be able to present a comprehensive understanding of the crime, hoping to have some help on the judicial practice . In this paper, including four asp ect. The first part discusses the historical evolution and the crime of bending the law th e legislation on fore ign. The second part focuses on the crime of crime, posed of four elements from the crime to start. The third part of this article described the crime in the judicial practice of favoritism in the judicial determination problem, issues of judicial practice on some preliminary discussion. Last part of the main reasons for favoritism crime incidence in the prevention mechanism put forward some con