文档介绍：题、传统的学术评审机制、期刊的经营机制和期刊的标准化问题,并针对这些问题提出了自己的几点建议。关键词:开放存取;开放存取期刊;质量控制:同行评议;元数据 Abstract Since 1970s,a small number mercial publishers indeveloped countries including Europe and theUnited States have gradually monopolized the market of academic journals through continuous mergers and constantly raisedthejournal price tograb highprofits,causing thatthelibrarycould notafford the increasingly risingexpenditures,which led tothe”Serial Crisis”·Inorder to regain thecontrol on theJournal’Smarket monopolize by business publishers,coupled withthe theopportunities brought by thedevelopment technology,some European andAmerican scientificand technological workers and opensupporters hit the”return scienceandtechnology publication toscholars”slogan,for which purpose they then launched an opca access Access advocates thatacademic information Can disseminate freewithout impediment and any person can obtain various types ofliteraturetimely,free and without any restrictions through work toobtain various types realization ofopen access journals mainly relies ontwo means:open access storage andopen access journals- Open access journals isgreatly different from open access storage inthatit adopts a more stringent quality ,the paper studys systematically and deeply on how torealize thequality control ofopen access with theopen access journals asthemain object paper USeS such’research methods as literature research and case bining quantitative and qualitative paper mainly focuses on thefollowing aspects: (1)the definition ofopen access and theway torealize it;analyzing themode of operation and main types ofopen access journals. (2)the paper describes thedevelopment status ofdomestic and internationalopen accessjournals and makes adialectical analysis ofthedoubt ofpeople on and the quality status ofopen access acomparative analysis oftraditional academic journals and eSSjoumals,