文档介绍：腔隙性脑梗塞扩管治疗与扩管扩容联合治疗效果的比较【摘要】目的: 通过对腔隙性脑梗塞扩管治疗与扩管扩容联合治疗疗效的比较,为临床提供合理的治疗方法。方法:将 82 例腔隙性脑梗塞患者分成两组, 第一组使用两种血管扩张剂, 第二组使用一种扩容剂和一种血管扩张剂,治疗后 24 小时和两周评定临床疗效。结果:第二组神经功能缺损评分明显优于第一组, 加重病例数少于第一组, 临床疗效具有统计学意义, p< 结论:急性腔隙性脑梗塞扩管扩容联合治疗优于单用两种扩管药物。【关键词】急性腔隙性脑梗塞;扩管治疗;扩容治疗【中图分类号】 【文献标识码】B【文章编号】 1004-7484 ( 2014 ) 06-3608-parison of lacunar cerebral infarction expansion pipe treatment and expansion pipe expansion joint treatment effect YueZhijian ( Yanqing county munity health service centers 102104 beijing ) 【 Abstract 】 Objective : parison of expansion pipe treatment and expansion pipe expansion joint treatment effect , provide reasonable for clinical treatment. Methods : 82 patients with lacunar cerebral infarction were divided into two groups , the first group to use two kinds of vasodilator , the second group used a kind of expansion agent and a vasodilator , 24 hours after treatment and two weeks to evaluate the efficacy Results : The first group of neurological deficit scores were significantly better than the first group , The first group is less than the number of cases increased , Clinical efficacy was statistically significant ,p < , Conclusion : Flaring acute lacunar infarction expansion bination therapy is superior to single drugs in two flaring. 【 Keywords 】 acute lacunar cerebral infarction expansion pipe treatment Expansion of treatment 脑梗塞是我国老年人的多发病, 常见病。我们回顾了 1 年来住院且