文档介绍：工人在定点屠宰场杀猪是否形成劳动关系
of rural drinking water sources, protection of drinking water sources in rural areas by the 2年5月21日之后，黄某未参与城西屠宰场的生猪屠宰加工。
of rural drinking water sources, protection of drinking water sources in rural areas by the end of the delimitation of the scope of protection, complete with warning signs, isolating network protection facilities
of rural drinking water sources, protection of drinking water sources in rural areas by the end of the delimitation of the scope of protection, complete with warning signs, isolating network protection facilities
of rural drinking water sources, protection of drinking water sources in rural areas by the end of the delimitation of the scope of protection, complete with warning signs, isolating network protection facilities
2022年5月，黄某发生一起交通事故。根据法律规定，如其与某位雇主之间存在劳动关系，其可主张工伤待遇。2022年5月，黄某向劳动争议仲裁委员会提出申请，要求确认其与兽医站之间存在劳动合同关系。同年7月25日，仲裁委作出裁决，认定黄某与兽医站之间劳动合同关系成立。兽医站不服，向法院提起诉讼。
庭审辩论各执一词
原告兽医站诉称，城西屠宰场是经主管部门批准设立的生猪屠宰点，我单位只是提供了屠宰的场所。镇生猪办委派人员统一向生猪加工个体老板收取相关规费后，仅向我单位返还场地费、检疫费。被告黄某从2022年至2022年期间偶尔到城西屠宰场屠宰生猪，具体的报酬由黄某本人与生猪加工的个体老板直接结算，我单位并不从黄某宰猪收入中获取利润，故其与我单位并没有任何关系，更不存在劳动合同关系，仲裁部门的仲裁缺乏法律依据。现请求法院判决认定我单位与被告黄某不存在事实劳动合同关系。
of rural drinking water sources, protection of drinking water sources in rural areas by the end of the delimitation of the scope of protection, complete with warning signs, isolating network protection facilities
of rural drinking water sources, protection of drinking water sources in rural areas by the end of the delimitation of the scope of protection, complete with warning signs, isolating network protection facilities
of rural drinking water sources, protection of drinking water sources in rural areas by the end of the delimitation of the scope of protection, complete with warning signs, isolating network protection facilities
被告黄某辩称，城西屠宰场的场地属于原告兽医站，兽医站也委派了工作人员陈某管理屠宰场的日常工作，应当将兽医站视为屠宰场的出资人。我到城西屠宰场是经兽医站工作人员陈某同意的，在屠宰生猪的过程中接受了陈某的管理，发生交通事故时，兽医还派人看望了我。康复后，兽医站工作人员陈某又接受我去兽医站当门卫，并向我发放