1 / 12
文档名称:

英语报刊阅读.ppt

格式:ppt   大小:532KB   页数:12页
下载后只包含 1 个 PPT 格式的文档,没有任何的图纸或源代码,查看文件列表

如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点这里二次下载

分享

预览

英语报刊阅读.ppt

上传人:sanshengyuanting 2017/7/25 文件大小:532 KB

下载得到文件列表

英语报刊阅读.ppt

文档介绍

文档介绍:is the American Dream
In June, a New York Times(《纽约时报》)-CBS News(美国哥伦比亚广播公司新闻频道) poll found that almost 90 percent of Americans think that homeownership is an important part of the American dream.
But only 7 percent of Americans we surveyed ranked homeownership as their first or second definition of the American dream.
Why the discrepancy(矛盾,差异)? Owning real estate is important to some Americans, but not as important——or as financially rewarding——as we’re led to believe.
Federal support of homeownership greatly overvalues its meaning in American life. Through tax breaks and guarantees, the government boosted homeownership to its peak in 2004, when 69 percent of American households owned homes.
Subsides for homeownership, including the mortgage(抵押借款,按揭) interest deduction, reached $230 billion in 2009, according to the Congressional Budget Office(国会预算局). Meanwhile, only $60 billion in tax breaks(减税优惠) and spending programs aided renters.
The results of this real estate spending spree(无节制的狂热行为) According to the Federal Reserve(美国联邦储备局), American real estate lost more than $6 trillion in value, or almost 30 percent, between 2006 and 2010. One in five American homeowners is underwater(价值缩水的,资不抵债的), owing more on a mortgage than what the home is worth.
Those who profit most from homeownership are far and away (by a great deal or amount; very much) the largest source of political campaign contributions.
panies, securities and investment firms, real estate interests, mercial banks gave more than $100 million to federal candidates and parties in 2011, according to the Center for Responsive Politics(政治反应中心).
The National Association of Realtors (NAR,美国房地产经纪人协会) alone gave more than $950,000——more than Morgan Stanley(摩根·史丹利投资公司), Citigroup (or Citi,花旗集团), or Ernst & Young(安永会计师事务所).