文档介绍：专利权期限制度科学性研究
(硕士论文摘要)
专利权作为商品经济发展的产物,起源于中世纪欧洲君主赐给工商业者的“垄断经营特权”,但昨天的这种“皇授神权”已经逐渐演变成了今天的“法定人权”。由于人们对于历史、专利权本身的不同看法,在理论界对于专利权的属性至今仍有争论,由这种争论导致了对于专利权期限制度产生不同认识,进而影响到对专利权期限制度的理解和规制。本文将基于这个逻辑思路分析专利权期限制度,并提出笔者自己的认识,以期完善我国的专利权期限制度。
本文将分四个部分来论述专利权期限制度:
第一部分,首先分析专利权权源属性,列举目前我国学术界的三种主要观点:工具论、私权论和平衡论。笔者认为工具论、平衡论存在逻辑缺陷,因而认同专利权属于私权的观点,并将对之进行论证。
第二部分,主要通过对发达国家、科技大国专利权期限制度的实证比较,来挖掘专利权期限制度的不同表现形式,并进而分析专利权期限制度本身所具有的特点。
第三部分,将着重对专利权期限制度进行科学性分析,从私权论的基点出发,来阐述专利权期限制度是市场经济条件下,专利权人以及潜在专利人之间基于交易成本的合意反映,并印证第二部分专利权期限制度所表现出的特点。认为只有走向真正自由的专利权期限制度,才能更加切实鼓励人们创造发明的积极性,并从整体上促进一个国家的科技进步。
第四部分,主要从立法、行政、司法三方面提出完善我国专利权期限制度的建议,提出了在立法方面专利权期限规定应当更加灵活,并增加委任性、准用性和任意性条款;在行政方面应当体现服务理念,对某些专利权的专利保护期限,能够更多反映专利权人的合意性;在司法方面能够起到对某些专利权期限进行个案监督的作用,以及对于特殊专利权期限的司法矫正作用。
[关键词] 专利权期限制度科学性
The patent term system scientific research
(Master paper abstract)
Major:
Study in: Intellectual property rights
Author:
Tutor:
A patent as things of modity economy development, originated from the medieval European monarch gave Businessmen’s “the monopoly franchise”. Today’s this "privilege" has gradually e the "right". Because people for patent history and patent itself exists different views, the patent’s nature in theoretical is still in dispute, which affect on the patent period of understanding and regulation. In the logical ideas put forward under the author understands, to expect more perfect our country’s patent term system.
This article includes four chapters. In the first chapter, it analysis of three different patent natures: Including the private rights theory, tools theory, dual nature theory. Then the author demonstrated that tools theory, dual nature theory existing logical flaws, think patents belongs to the private rights and demonstration.
In the second chapter, it mainly through several developed countries patent term system parison, to study a patent term system of different features.
In the third chapter, it is from the Angle of proprietary nature, think that patent term system is under the