1 / 138
文档名称:

OECD-2016-2025全球农业展望.pdf

格式:pdf   大小:3,977KB   页数:138页
下载后只包含 1 个 PDF 格式的文档,没有任何的图纸或源代码,查看文件列表

如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点这里二次下载

OECD-2016-2025全球农业展望.pdf

上传人:琥珀 2018/1/10 文件大小:3.88 MB

下载得到文件列表

OECD-2016-2025全球农业展望.pdf

文档介绍

文档介绍:OECD‑FAO Agricultural Outlook 2016‑2025
The twelfth joint edition of the OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook provides market projections to 2025 for major
modities, biofuels and fish. The 2016 report contains a special feature on the prospects for,
and challenges facing, Sub-Saharan Africa.
Over the ten-year Outlook period, slowing demand growth will be matched by efficiency gains in production,
implying relatively flat real agricultural prices. However, market and policy uncertainties imply a risk
of resurgent volatility. The outlook for agriculture in Sub-Saharan Africa is for rising food availability, OECD‑FAO Agricultural
which will support a declining incidence of undernourishment. The sector’s prospects could be much improved
by more stable policies across the region, by strategic public and private investments, notably in infrastructure, Outlook 2016‑2025
and by suitably adapted research and extension.
Contents
Executive summary
Chapter 1. Overview of the OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2016-2025
Chapter 2. Agriculture in Sub-Saharan Africa: Prospects and challenges for the next decade Special focus: Sub-Saharan Africa
Chapter 3. Commodity snapshots
More modity chapters are available on line at http://dx./-2016-en.
The projections and past trends presented in the statistical annex can be viewed in more detail
at http://dx./-data-en.
Supplementary information can be found at .org.
OECD‑FAO Agricultural Outlook 2016‑2025
Consult this publication on line at http://dx./-2016-en.
This work is published on the OECD iLibrary, which gathers all OECD books, periodicals and statistical databases.
Visit for more information.
isbn 978-92-64-25322-3
51 2016 02 1 P 9HSTCQE*d+
OECD-FAO
Agricultural Outlook
2016-2025
This work is published under the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD and the
Director-General of the FAO. The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein do not