1 / 28
文档名称:

The Multiplier Process as Market Exchange Process.doc

格式:doc   页数:28
下载后只包含 1 个 DOC 格式的文档,没有任何的图纸或源代码,查看文件列表

如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点这里二次下载

The Multiplier Process as Market Exchange Process.doc

上传人:bajiaoshan1hao 2012/5/10 文件大小:0 KB

下载得到文件列表

The Multiplier Process as Market Exchange Process.doc

文档介绍

文档介绍:The Multiplier Process
as Market Exchange Process
A Contribution to the Micro Foundation of Keynesian Macroeconomics
Gang Gong#. Dept. of economics, Graduate Faculty, New School for Social Research, 65 Fifth Ave. New York, NY 10003. ******@.

Feb., 1995
The author is very grateful to Edward Nell, Willi Semmler, Duncan Foley, David Colander, John Eatwell, Paul Davidson and William Milberg for ments and suggestions on the early draft of this paper.
The Multiplier Process as Market Exchange Process
A Contribution to the Micro Foundation of Keynesian Macroeconomics
Abstract
Traditional equilibrium analysis has been incorrectly founded once an "ordering issue" is concerned. To circumvent this problem, the autonomous demand, which has been missed in traditional microeconomic analysis, has to be introduced into the system as a starting point of a sequence of market exchanges. Following this direction, Keynes's multiplier analysis can also be viewed as a description of the process through which market exchanges are generated. Further, the Keynesian macroeconomic relation can also be proved within a micro economic context. (JEL D0, E0)
"The consensus in macroeconomics that prevailed until the early 1970s faltered because of two flaws, one empirical and the other theoretical. ... The theoretical flaw was that the consensus view left a chasm between microeconomic principles and macroeconomic practice that was too great to be intellectually satisfying." (Mankiw, 1990, pp. 1647)
I. Introduction
Last twenty years have witnessed two opposite research directions. One, entitled as New Classical, is to explain macroeconomic phenomena based on an individual choice-theoretic framework of traditional microeconomics though the axiom of rational expectation is often adopted. The other is the attempt to reconstruct microeconomics so as to put Keynesian macro-analysis on a firmer foundation. This category is now termed New Keynesian. Is the "chasm" still left? W