文档介绍:该【2025年GRE写作评分及常见问题解读(精选6篇) 】是由【圭圭】上传分享,文档一共【21】页,该文档可以免费在线阅读,需要了解更多关于【2025年GRE写作评分及常见问题解读(精选6篇) 】的内容,可以使用淘豆网的站内搜索功能,选择自己适合的文档,以下文字是截取该文章内的部分文字,如需要获得完整电子版,请下载此文档到您的设备,方便您编辑和打印。
2025年GRE写作评分及常见问题解读(精选6篇)
篇1:GRE写作评分及常见问题解读
GRE写作评分及常见问题解读
GRE作文包括issue和argument两部分,总分为6分,以下是GRE作文评分的一些标准,希望能给广大GRE考生带来一些帮助。
(1) complexity:事物的两面性(同一事物有优点就有缺点,相比较的事物有各自的优缺点),从多角度分析事物(分析不同领域中,不同情况下)。论点一边倒的文章论述得再好也只能得5分。
(2) insightful position:在有全面深刻理解的基础上,观点最好新颖独到(对ets来说),但必须保证能自圆其说。
(3) conveys meaning skillfully:可用于论证的一切技巧(估计老美自己用起来也得费点心思)。比如文章的行文方向,起承转合不用明显的标志词(first, second, however, on the other hand, the second example illustrating my point),而是依靠论述的内在脉络(只可意会不可言传)自然而然的引到下一块内容。
(4) compelling reasons(reason就已经够令人头疼的了,有加了个compelling):这是最重要的一个得分点。
(5) persuasive examples:用来支持reason的,使抽象的reason更具体,更易被读者理解,从而产生共鸣,或使其更可信,更有说服力。可用的例子有自己的经历,引言。
(6) well-focused:简单说就是不跑题。中心论点明确,全文不跑题;各段主题句明确,围绕主题句论述。
(7) well-organized:文章采用的论述结构,分几个部分论述,每部分有几段,各部分、各段间的关系是什么。
(8) connecting ideas logically:using transitional phrases起承转合词,过渡句,或有此种作用的句子,总之起到help organize the ideas and move the argument forward。
(9) 跟着感觉走没错。
(10) 不要罗嗦,表达简洁。但如果以上几点做得好,这缺点可以忽略不计。
(11) 基本上挺难,但不影响大局,为避免重复大胆的用你想用的词,阅卷人能理解。
(12) sentence variety:最好长短句结合,ets藐视总用短句的人:Since most of the sentences are short and choppy, the ideas they try to communicate are also choppy.
(13) 还有语法错误等等,小毛病,先把上面的问题解决好在理它吧。
GRE issue写作优秀实例:权威问题
题目:
Much of the information that people assume is 'factual' actually turns out to be inaccurate. Thus, any piece of information referred to as a 'fact' should be mistrusted since it may well be proven false in the future.
大多数人们认为是事实的信息结果实际上都是不准确的。因此,任何据称是事实的信息都应该被质疑,因为它在将来很可能会被证明为是错误的。
正文:
Should we be doubtful to all the information at hands because the rightness of which is uncertain? The speaker claims so, I concede that people often commit various fallacies in the course of cognizing things, however I fundamentally take exception of the arguer's assertion to mistrust every fact we might encounter. And I will substantially discuss my views thereinafter.
To begin with, the speaker seems to implicate that a fact would be proven false in the future under numerous circumstance. Nevertheless I prefer to arguer that facts never change. No matter how did the Medieval Church and Inquisition persecute Bruno, the fact never changes that the earth is far from being the center of the universe as the religious sovereigns had assumed or hoped for, while just a minor particle in it. Equally, no matter how Edison had tried to incite the public fear and distrust to the alternative current electricity, the fact never changes that Teals' electrical system is vastly superior to his direct current electrical one, and would be accepted and applied in larger range.
However, what do change are the human's objective interpretations to facts. One compelling argument to this point is that, due to the limitation of human's knowledge and comprehensive capability, they tend to make insufficient or even false understanding to the certain fact. An apt illustration is the changes of cognition to disease. While at the ancient time, our progenitors believed the a man becoming a patient for the reason that he had conduct crimes or offended some ghosts or spirits,the contemporary people have well know that the varies of pathogens are the basic causes to our diseases, and the defects of our immune system and so forth are also the factors as well. Another argument for the change of comprehension to fact is that different people always observe and interpret from different perspectives. Though the Relativity theory is not well compliable with the Quantum mechanism, no one call the greatness of both Einstein and Bohr, because their theories are based on distinct views, the former from the macrocosm and the later from the microcosm.
Notwithstanding the foregoing reasons for that human tend to make fallacies during the cause of comprehending and cognizing facts, these reasons should never be the excuses to doubt every conclusion we might draw from facts. Based on certain rational inference and proper knowledge fundament, the conclusions we make might well be justifiable, if not completely right, to certain degree. What we need to do is to promote the enterprise of pursuing the better answer and try to use the result we have get to application, instead of wasting our time to undue doubt and suspicion. Though the medical scientists have not fully understood the mechanism of how the does the implanted organ interact with the wounded body, they are not refrain from using the implanting skill to save patients, of course the precondition or which is that this technology is much well established than the fundamental theory.
To sum up, while I advocate the speaker's opinion that it is inevitable for human to comprehend facts inaccurately, for the reason of the limitation of the abilities, I essentially disagree with his assertion that facts will continually alter themselves, as well as his recommendation to discredit any piece of fact. In the final analysis, I would arguer once more that facts never change and although the misunderstanding to them is inevitable, we should not defer ourselves from the pursuit to fully comprehending them.
GRE issue写作优秀实例:思想家
题目:
Most societies do not take their greatest thinkers seriously, even when they claim to admire them.
大多数社会都没把最伟大的思想家当回事,虽然有时候这些社会自称是求才若渴的。
正文:
In this busy, packed and dull world, people’s most important concerning is how to make a living. They work assiduously to make money, to support their family, to purchase houses and cars. Hardly one common individual knows who their greatest thinkers are,not mention to take them seriously. Admittedly, in some cases, people claim that they admire the greatest thinkers; however, they actually know little about what the greatest thinkers’ thoughts are. The fact is, in history of human civilizations,most societies do not take their greatest thinkers seriously, even when the greatest thinkers are seemed to be respected.
Generally, whatever societies the greatest thinkers are in, they have similar characteristics, such as high intelligence, eccentric temperament, wide range of knowledge, and the most essential one: the deeply and often predicted thoughts, which is the product of real wisdom. On one hand, it is the thoughts that distinguish the greatest thinkers from the mass. On the other hand, it is also the thoughts, however correct and predicted, which cause these elites out of the mass’ sights and put them into an embarrassment in which few can understand them and their thoughts. A proper example is the passional German philosopher and poet Nietzche. Nietzche is a pioneer, whose profound exploration in philosophy influenced the descendants deeply. Yet his life is miserable and full of tragedies. Without money and job, Nietzche lived an impoverished life, which along with loneliness defeated him at last: he became insane when 45, and died 10 years later. Until that time, almost no one knew him or his thoughts. Even today, many people including some scholars call him mad philosopher.
In some worse cases, the greatest thinkers are even persecuted by their societies since the greatest thinkers always tend to have skeptical and critical thoughts, which the manipulators fear mostly and manipulated reluctant to accept. The reason is that once the advanced ideas, which are against the old ones, are accepted by mass, the domination or the present social system will in the danger of collapse. And at the same times, most people are reluctant to admit that what they believe in or cherish, however,always prejudice and rigid ideas set in people’s minds beforehand, are not the truth but falsehood or illusions. A case in point is the great astronomer Copernicus, who developed the theory that the earth and other planets revolve around the sun. Although the theory was the most advanced astronomy theory in that time, it hadn’t come out of press until the year before Copernicus’ death because of mass being strongly against it especially the powerful churches, which were afraid that such a theory would shake authority of theology.
In some specific period, for political reasons, thinker and intellectuals as a whole undergo ruthless treatment, such as the Culture Revolution from 1966 to 1976 in China. During those ten years, many great thinkers and intellectuals are forbidden to think and express their thoughts freely. Some of them even encountered physical torture. A crueler example is Qin Dynasty in China years ago. Yingzheng, the first emperor of China, sentenced the thinkers who held different political or social ideas from him to death. Moreover, he buried their writings.
It is the greatest thinkers’ tragedy not to be understood or even be persecuted. It is also the fact that human beings are always shortsighted, sometimes even foolish. Nevertheless, what is truth will never change itself or disappear along with the elapsing of time however strong the falsehood seems to be. Hence, though almost all the greatest thinkers are hermits, some of them may be even the prisoners in their societies; they would gain their perpetual lives through their glaring
篇2:逐条解读GRE写作6大评分标准
1. complexity
事物的两面性(同一事物有优点就有缺点,相比较的事物有各自的优缺点),从多角度分析事物(分析不同领域中,不同情况下)。论点一边倒的文章论述得再好也只能得5分。
position
在有全面深刻理解的基础上,观点最好新颖独到(对ets来说),但必须保证能自圆其说。5分文的要求是well-considered position,因此只要求多论述几个理由,多考虑几个方面,表明你确实好好思考过,而不强求对论述题目有全面深刻的认识。看看ets范文的3篇5分文,你就能感觉的它们和6分文在思考深刻全面上的差距。所以,若对某方面论题不了解,还有一个月就要上考场的话,就不必花大时间饿补相关知识,只需看看别人的提纲,结合自己肚里的东西(足够),整理出自己的提纲,GRE考场上有条理性的加以论证。但切记,既然在这个给分点上你已经失去了优势,就应该在其他给分点下功夫:论述结构,论证技巧以及语言运用。
3. conveys meaning skillfully
可用于论证的一切技巧(估计老美自己用起来也得费点心思)。比如文章的行文方向,起承转合不用明显的标志词(first, second, however, on the other hand, the second example illustrating my point),而是依靠论述的内在脉络(只可意会不可言传)自然而然的引到下一块内容。总之是看不到transitional phrases确能明显感觉到论述的方向及其改变(例ets范文2, 6分文的第二段首句的作用)。再比如巧妙地运用引言代替自己的reason(如ets范文1的As the head once said)。再有一个深受老美喜爱的论证技巧:vivid metaphor(如ets范文1的to inspect only one's toenails is to ignore the whole body),使枯燥的reason生动形象。总之,此点是用来筛选6分文的,故对5分文作者不要求。5分文的要求是conveys meaning clearly,所以把话说清楚别词不达意,茶壶煮饺子倒不出来就行。
4. compelling reasons
这是最重要的一个得分点。就是你的理由及其论证,目的是让读者认可你的理由,从而接受论点。5分文要求logically sound reasons,结合ets范文可看出6分文要求理由非常有说服力,而5分文要求理由合常理,读者认为没错即可。
examples
用来支持reason的,使抽象的reason更具体,更易被读者理解,从而产生共鸣,或使其更可信,更有说服力。可用的例子有自己的经历,引言。在范文里Ets重点表扬过两种举例方式:1). extended examples(见范文1, 6分文),叙述例子的过程就是reason的过程;2). examples are varied(见反问2,6分文),举各个领域的例子或例子涉及的范围很广。恰切的例子一定要论述充分(不然ets都替你可惜)。5分文要求well-chosen examples, 4分要求是relevant examples,因此,要达到5分要求,例子一定得典型,多少有点说服力。个人经历是最好的例子,但不能是特例。
6. well-focused
简单说就是不跑题。中心论点明确,全文不跑题;各段主题句明确,围绕主题句论述。使读者读完后对行文脉络,各段段意有清晰的印象。5分的要求是:is focused,内容上不如6分文联系那么紧密,但也应给读者留下同样的印象 。
GRE写作模仿范文的方法
(最好是带有说理性的文章)。