文档介绍：SOFT LAW, SELF-REGULATION AND CO-REGULATION IN EUROPEAN LAW: Where Do They Meet? This article partly draws on the research done for my doctoral thesis, Soft Law in munity Law (Oxford [etc.]: Hart Publishing, 2004).
Linda Senden The author is Professor of European Law, Faculty of Law, Tilburg University, herlands.
Readers are reminded that this work is protected by copyright. While they are free to use the
ideas expressed in it, they may not copy, distribute or publish the work or part of it, in any
form, printed, electronic or otherwise, except for reasonable quoting, clearly indicating the
source. Readers are permitted to make copies, electronically or printed, for personal and
classroom use.
Abstract
Over the past decade, the EU has been developing a new regulatory policy, which increasingly puts emphasis on the use of alternative instruments or on instruments that plementary to mand-and-control legislation. This aim of diversification of the Union’s regulatory instruments is fundamentally inspired by the concern to enhance the effectiveness, legitimacy and transparency of EU action. These alternative instruments - including inter alia mendations and voluntary agreements - are often labelled with the general terms of ‘soft law’, ‘self-regulation’ and/or ‘co-regulation’. This article is aimed at providing a general insight into the meaning which these concepts currently have within the context of the EU; it discusses the legal framework for the use thereof and touches upon some possible effects in terms of legitimacy. Furthermore, it addresses the interconnectedness of the phenomenon of soft law on the one hand and of self-regulation and co-regulation on the other. In this respect, particular attention is given to the course taken within the framework of the White Paper on European Governance 2001, the mission Action plan ‘Simplifying and improving the regulatory environment, the Interinstitutional Agreement on better law-making of 2003 and the Treaty estab