1 / 30
文档名称:

《公共政策分析》PPT课件.ppt

格式:ppt   大小:2,518KB   页数:30页
下载后只包含 1 个 PPT 格式的文档,没有任何的图纸或源代码,查看文件列表

如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点这里二次下载

分享

预览

《公共政策分析》PPT课件.ppt

上传人:88jmni97 2018/6/11 文件大小:2.46 MB

下载得到文件列表

《公共政策分析》PPT课件.ppt

文档介绍

文档介绍:Public Policy and Policy Analysis
contents
Introduction
1
2
Policy analysis
3
Empirical methods
4
Public policy, administration and management
Policy process models
5
6
Responses to criticism
7
Political public policy
8
Conclusion
9
Limitations of the policy analysis approach
Introduction
In the period roughly from the 1950s to the 1970s, ‘public policy’really began to take off, and public administration began to move into a state of decline which was to accelerate in the 1980s’(Parsons, 1995, p. 7).
By the early 1970s, some involved in the study of public policy consciously and deliberately distanced themselves from the discipline of public adminis-tration. Most public policy practitioners at the time saw it as concerned with the application of formal, mathematical methods to solving public sector problems.
The argument here is that there are now two public policy approaches, each with its own concerns and emphases:

The first is termed ‘policy analysis’;

The policy analysis people are those who have continued to develop the field in the way it started, that is, by the use of sometimes highly abstract statistics and mathematical models, with the focus on decision-making and policy formation.
Introduction
Introduction
The second is ‘political public policy’.

Political public policy theorists are more inter-ested in the results or es of public policy, the political interactions determining a particular event, and in policy areas – health, education, welfare,the environment, for example – rather than in the use of statistical methods.
Introduction
Public policy could now be considered either as a separate paradigm, competing with public administration and public management or as a set of analytical methods applicable to both. It is argued here that the public policy movement is closely related to the traditional model of public administration, with its implicit acceptance of the bureaucratic model and its ‘one best way’ thinking. Th