文档介绍：密级: 学校代码:10075
分类号: 学号:20110264
法学硕士学位论文
警察出庭作证问题研究
学位申请人:朱晰聪
指导教师:陈玉忠教授
学位类别:法学硕士
学科专业:诉讼法学
授予单位:河北大学
答辩日期:二〇一四年六月
Classified Index: CODE: 10075
: NO: 20110264
A Dissertation for the Degree of M. Law
Research on the problem of the
police to testify in court
Candidate: Zhu Xicong
Supervisor: Prof. Yuzhong Chen
Academic Degree Applied for: Master of law
Specialty: Procedural law
University: Hebei University
Date of Oral Examination: June, 2014
摘要
摘要
在西方发达国家,尤其是在英美法系国家,警察出庭作证是个十分普遍的现象,警
察同其他普通证人一样宣誓、作证、接受控辩双方的询问,把出庭作证当做自己应尽的
职责和义务,甚至警察出庭作证在这些国家根本不成其为一个问题。而反过来再看我国
大陆地区的刑事诉讼,警察不出庭作证反而是庭审活动中的一种****惯做法。作为直接接
触案件中很多实体事实和程序事实的人,在法庭审判的过程中,警察是否应该出庭作证,
直到 1996 年我国刑事诉讼法的修改,才成为人们开始关注的一个话题,此后渐渐登上
了中国司法体制改革的舞台。随着 2012 年我国刑事诉讼法对警察作证制度的规定,警
察出庭作证的价值逐渐凸显,警察出庭作证不仅有利于法律的正确适用,提高诉讼效率,
有助于实现对非法证据的排除,保障被告人的合法权利,促进司法公正,而且对于促进
刑事诉讼构造重构也具有重要意义。因此,无论是在法学界,还是在司法实务当中,警
察出庭作证制度均受到越来越多的重视,并在法庭审理过程中也开始逐步出现了一些警
察出庭作证的案例。尽管我国当前的法制环境以及诉讼制度还存在很多阻碍警察出庭作
证的现实因素(例如传统观念的影响、诉讼结构的制约、立法的不合理、证据规则的缺
失等),但是,只要我们从中国的具体国情出发,建构合乎本国发展需要的制度法规,
警察出庭作证制度在我国真正发挥其应有作用的那一天将指日可待。
关键词刑事诉讼警察出庭作证制度建构
I
Abstract
Abstract
In the western developed countries, especially in the Anglo-American law system
countries, the police to testify in court is a mon phenomenon, the police as well as
mon witness oaths, to testify, accepts the inquiry from parties, treating testify as
their responsibility and obligation, even the police appearing in court as a witness in these
countries barely a problem. But if we look at the criminal proceedings in China, the police do
not testify in court has e a kind of normal, as the witnesses of many substantive facts
and procedural facts, in the process of trial, whether the police should be called to testify, no
matter in the theoretical field or judicial practicing has never been challenged until