1 / 44
文档名称:

票据伪造法律问题的研究.pdf

格式:pdf   页数:44
下载后只包含 1 个 PDF 格式的文档,没有任何的图纸或源代码,查看文件列表

如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点这里二次下载

分享

预览

票据伪造法律问题的研究.pdf

上传人:459972402 2015/10/7 文件大小:0 KB

下载得到文件列表

票据伪造法律问题的研究.pdf

相关文档

文档介绍

文档介绍:The Research on Negotiable Instrument Forgery

Abstract

Negotiable instrument takes as one kind pletely negotiable securities,
itself represents certain property value. After entering the circulation, it must e
the object that some unlawful elements in order to seek the illegal benefit. With
negotiable instrument forgery behavior as illegal ing out, negotiable
instrument forgery not only affects the normal development of economic order, but
also harms relevant parties’ economic benefits. It is necessary to ascertain the rule of
undertaking the negotiable instrument forgery risk in view of ascertaining legal
validity of negotiable instrument forgery for relevant parties further. The paper has
carried paring and analyzing to the legal validity and risk assumption theory
of negotiable instrument forgery in the two law systems of negotiable instruments by
comparative analysis, and analyzed the merit and the ing of regulation
respectively. At the same time, the paper has pointed out the different regulation of
two law systems of negotiable instrument is reflecting the different emphasize on
negotiable instrument’s “static security” and “dynamic security”. And found out
imperfections and propose legislative solutions by profound analysis of relevant
regulation of negotiable instrument forgery so as to perfect our negotiable instrument
legislation.
The paper is divided into four parts mainly: Part one is the summary of
negotiable instrument forgery. This part is based on the elaboration of the concept
and elements of construction. It puts forward several concepts apt to obscure with
the negotiable instrument forgery: having no right to act as agent of behavior of the
negotiable instrument, the negotiable instrument acting on one’s behalf, negotiable
instrument signed and usurped, negotiable instrument adulterated. Part two tells the
legal validity of negotiable instrument forgery. It points pares regulations on
le