1 / 238
文档名称:

Moral.Dilemmas.in.Medieval.Thought.From.Gratian.to.Aquinas,.Dougherty,.CUP,.2011.pdf

格式:pdf   页数:238
下载后只包含 1 个 PDF 格式的文档,没有任何的图纸或源代码,查看文件列表

如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点这里二次下载

Moral.Dilemmas.in.Medieval.Thought.From.Gratian.to.Aquinas,.Dougherty,.CUP,.2011.pdf

上传人:kuo08091 2014/1/11 文件大小:0 KB

下载得到文件列表

Moral.Dilemmas.in.Medieval.Thought.From.Gratian.to.Aquinas,.Dougherty,.CUP,.2011.pdf

文档介绍

文档介绍:This page intentionally left blank
MORAL DILEMMAS IN
MEDIEVAL THOUGHT
The history of moral dilemma theory often ignores the medieval
period, overlooking the sophisticated theorizing by several thinkers
who debated the existence of moral dilemmas from around  to
. In this book, M. V. Dougherty offers a rich and fascinating
overview of the debates which were pursued by medieval philoso-
phers, theologians, and canon lawyers, illustrating his discussion with
a diverse range of examples of the moral dilemmas which they consid-
ered. He shows that much of what seems particular to twentieth-
century moral theory was well known long ago – especially the
view of some medieval thinkers that some forms of wrongdoing are
inescapable, and their emphasis on the principle ‘choose the lesser of
two evils’. His book will be valuable not only to advanced students
and specialists of medieval thought, but also to those interested in the
history of ethics.
m. v. dougherty is Associate Professor of Philosophy at Ohio
Dominican University. He is the editor of Pico della Mirandola: New
Essays (Cambridge, ).
MORAL DILEMMAS IN
MEDIEVAL THOUGHT
From Gratian to Aquinas
M. V. DOUGHERTY
Ohio Dominican University
cambridge university press
Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore,
Sao˜ Paulo, Delhi, Dubai, Tokyo, Mexico City
Cambridge University Press
The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge cbru,UK
Published in the United States of America by Cambridge University Press, New York
c . Dougherty 
This publication is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception
and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements,
no reproduction of any part may take place without the written
permission of Cambridge University Press.
First published 
Printed in the United Kingdom at the University Press, Cambridge
A catalogue record for this publication is available from the British Library
Library of Congres