1 / 28
文档名称:

Skinner - Some Problems In The Analysis Of Political Thought And Action.pdf

格式:pdf   页数:28
下载后只包含 1 个 PDF 格式的文档,没有任何的图纸或源代码,查看文件列表

如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点这里二次下载

Skinner - Some Problems In The Analysis Of Political Thought And Action.pdf

上传人:kuo08091 2014/1/11 文件大小:0 KB

下载得到文件列表

Skinner - Some Problems In The Analysis Of Political Thought And Action.pdf

文档介绍

文档介绍:Some Problems in the Analysis of Political Thought and Action
Quentin Skinner
Political Theory, Vol. 2, No. 3 (Aug., 1974), 277-303.
Stable URL:
http://links./sici?sici=0090-5917%28 197408%292%3A3%3C277%3ASPITA0%%3B2-0
Political Theory is currently published by Sage Publications, Inc..
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at
http://uk./about/. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have
obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you
may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, mercial use.
Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at
http://uk./joumals/.
Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or
printed page of such transmission.
JSTOR is an independent not-for-anization dedicated to creating and preserving a digital archive of
scholarly journals. For more information regarding JSTOR, please contact ******@.
http://uk./
Sat Apr 9 18:37:57 2005
Ill. SOME PROBLEMS IN THE
ANALYSIS OF POLITICAL
THOUGHT AND ACTION
QUENTIN SKINNER
Chr~st'sCdIep (Cambridge, England)
not just for thelr generosity menting on my work, but also for their
accuracy m reporting my arguments and thelr perceptiveness as critics. It
seems possible to respond to thelr remarks in one of two ways. One would
be to pursue the implications of Wiener's article and try to provlde some
more hstorical Information about the context of Hobbes's political
thought. Thls strikes me as an attractive alternative, especially since I agree
wth his suggestion that I ought to devote more attention to analyslng the
nature of the soclal pressures which helped to prompt Hobbes and hls
sympathlsers t