文档介绍：论并存的债务承担中文摘要I中文摘要并存的债务承担,又称债务加入,我国法律对此尚未对此进行规定,概念不清和规定不明导致市场中出现的并存的债务承担行为缺乏规范和指引,在审判和执行实践中也易出现事实认定的误差和法律适用的混乱。故笔者试对并存的债务承担从法理和实务两方面进行研究,以期对并存的债务承担的理论和实务发展起到一定的作用。本文首先明确了并存的债务承担的定义和构成要件。在分述了各大陆法系国家和我国台湾地区关于并存的债务承担的定义和规定后得出并存的债务承担的定义,并详细论述了并存的债务承担形成之债的性质,并对该性质所联系的相关的债权人、债务人和第三人的权利义务进行了阐述。第二部分主要论述并存的债务承担与类似概念的区分,本部分内容首先从理论上对并存的债务承担和保证、第三人代为履行和免责的债务承担的概念进行了相同点和不同点的分析,其次通过相关案例阐述实践中如何区分类似概念。第三部分主要区别并存的债务承担不同类型进行了效力分析。第四部分重点阐述了并存的债务承担的立法、审判和执行现状,并通过典型案例,分析并存的债务承担案例的事实认定和法律适用中存在的问题并进行评析。最后本文对执行和解协议中存在的并存的债务承担的法律适用及方案选择进行了论述。关键词:并存的债务承担并存的债务承担协议法律效力法律实践作者:周金玲指导老师:王斌Abstract Analysis on the Coexistence of Debt Undertaking IIAnalysis on the Coexistence of Debt Undertaking Abstract The coexistence of debt undertaking, also known as debt accession, has not been regulated in the contract law. The lack of regulation causes confusion in application of the law and ascertaining of the facts. Therefore, the author tries to research in the theoretical and practical aspects in order to promote the development of this system. This paper stated the definition and the elements of the coexistence of debt undertaking first. After discussing the definition and the regulations of the coexistence of debt undertaking in the mainland legal system countries and Taiwan area of china, the author provides the different point of the definition of the coexistence of debt undertaking. This paper also discusses the formation of the coexistence of debt undertaking, then analyses the rights and obligations of the creditor,the debtor and the third party. Part II focuses on the distinction between the similar concepts of the coexistence of debt undertaking. This part analyses the similarities and differences of the coexistence of debt undertaking and the guarantees, performance of obligations by the third party, exemption of debt undertaking. Then the author describes how to distinguish above these similar concepts by the analyses of the relevant cases. Part II