1 / 31
文档名称:

审查起诉程序的再思考.pdf

格式:pdf   页数:31页
下载后只包含 1 个 PDF 格式的文档,没有任何的图纸或源代码,查看文件列表

如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点这里二次下载

分享

预览

审查起诉程序的再思考.pdf

上传人:sp4772 2016/3/8 文件大小:0 KB

下载得到文件列表

审查起诉程序的再思考.pdf

文档介绍

文档介绍:摘要审查起诉不仅是连接侦查程序与审判程序的桥梁,也有其独立的价值。公正、效率、人权保障都是审查起诉程序所追求的价值目标。科学、民主的审查起诉程序对于我国刑事诉讼公正、效率等价值的实现有着相当重要的作用。当前我国审查起诉程序存在诸如控辩地位不平等、权利不对等,不当追诉,不起诉虚置等问题。究其原因,有观念层面的,有机制层面的,也有具体操作层面的。审查起诉程序的进步和完善一方面要立足于中国的国情,另一方面也要符合刑事诉讼的基本理论和刑事诉讼的价值目标。本文除引言部分外共分四个部分。第一部分主要是分析审查起诉程序的性质和地位,指出审查起诉程序监督和引导侦查、案件过滤、启动审判的功能;第二部分主要分析审查起诉程序的价值,审查起诉程序作为刑事诉讼中一个组成部分,其具有公正、效率、人权保障的价值;第三部分主要分析了我国审查起诉程序的存在问题;第四部分主要在前三部分对审查起诉程序进行剖析的基础上,对我国审查起诉程序提出了完善的建议:首先应增强辩护方的权利,保证辩护律师权利的充分实现;其次应完善案件的分流机制,建立附条件不起诉制度,提高刑事诉讼的效率;第三,加强对刑事被害人权利保护,防止不起诉程序制约的虚置。[关键词] 审查起诉效率不当追诉诉讼分流 ABSTRACT Censorship and proceeding not only serves as thebridge linking scout and trail,but has itsown ,efficiency,human fights guarantee are thevalue and goals thatCensorship and proceeding pursues. Scientific and democratic censorship and proceeding is of crucial importance tothefulfillment ofsuch goals asjustice andefficiency in China’S criminal existing censorship and proceeding in China’Sjudicial system hassuch problems asunequal footing and rights between theprosecutor and thecounsel,inevitable improper prosecuting, andsuspending ofno—prosecuting may lieindifferent levelsranging fromconcept,mechanism and advancement .andimprovement ofcensorship and proceeding should proceed from china’Sgeneral conditions on the one hand,and accord with thebasic theory,value and goals ofcriminallitigation on theotherhand. Besides theintroduction,this prised firstpart primarily analyses the nature and status ofcensorship and proceeding,points out such functions assupervising and guiding scout, lawsuit filtering and initiating trailthatcensorship and proceeding has. The second partchiefly dealswith thevalue ofcensorship and proceeding; as acomposing part ofthecriminallitigation,censorship andproceeding isimportance inthat it’Sjustice,efficient,and can help toguarantee human thirdpartmainly explores the existing problems of censorship and proceeding inChina’Sjudicial on