文档介绍：I 摘要域名本是与计算机的互联网协议地址相对应,用于识别和定位计算机的层次结构式的字符标识,然而,域名之上却承载着某种的利益。尽管因该种利益目前还没有被任何一个国家的法律承认为一种民事权利或知识产权而不能成为域名权利,但凡是通过合法途径获得域名的域名注册人的利益均普遍受到各国法律的承认和保护,换言之,通过合法途径获得的域名之上承载的利益属于未权利化的合法或正当利益,即域名权益。同时鉴于域名权益与知识产权的相似性,则可以进一步认为域名之上承载的利益应为一种类似于知识产权的新型民事权益。尽管域名权益与姓名权存在着很大的差异,但由于现有的域名注册制度并不排斥将自然人的姓名作为域名注册,同时这也恰是姓名权人在网络时代与网络环境中行使其姓名使用权的一种体现,从而使这两种不同性质的权益发生了关联,为域名与姓名权益冲突的产生留下了隐患。域名与姓名权益冲突既包括简单的民事侵权,也包括合法权益相互间的冲突, 并且更多地表现为合法权益相互间的冲突。其具体的现实或潜在表现形式呈多样化, 本文通过梳理对其具体表现形式进行了类型化,并在此基础上,分析了隐藏在具体表现形式背后的制度根源、直接原因和潜在原因。域名与姓名权益冲突不应被置之于法律之外。然而,有关冲突防范与解决的法律制度之缺失和以统一域名纠纷处理机制为基础,由诉讼、仲裁与域名争议解决机构( CIETAC )裁决、调解、和解和行政解决构成的多元纠纷处理机制的“单中心”化,使得我国的域名与姓名权益冲突防范与解决呈极不完善之状态。相比之下,相关国际组织如 WIPO 以及有些国家,如美国和德国却走在了前列,其有关冲突防范与解决的探索与实践对我国有着极为重要的借鉴意义。针对我国关于域名与姓名权益冲突防范与解决的法律制度和解决机制存在的问题、借鉴域外的相关探索与实践,本文认为应当通过建立域名注册防御机制、以“平等保护合法权益,优先保护在先与较为重要的合法权益”原则为指导构建域名注册人与姓名权人以及姓名权人之间的利益平衡机制、建立与完善“多中心”的域名与姓名权益冲突解决机制和完善相关法律制度,为解决域名与姓名权益冲突提供法律依据等措施来防范与解决域名与姓名权益冲突。关键词: 域名权益姓名权冲突防范解决 II Abstract puter on the needs an a ddress, which is called Protocol Address (IP), so that information can find it s way to the right recipient. The IP is structured with thirty-two bit numbers and can ’t be remembered easily by users. For ease of use, domain names are originally used to map to the IP addresses. As everyone knows, there is some interests in domain names, which hasn’t been recognized by any country as a kind of civil rights or in tellectual property righ ts, but such interests owned by domain name holder has been genera lly protected in the legal system of any country. That is to say, although the interests in domain names is not recognized as a right, it is definitely legal interests which is calle d interests in domain name. Meanwhile, since there are some similarities between such inte rests and intellectual pr operty rights , it could be concluded that such interests in a new kind of civil interests that is similar to intellectual property rights. It is quite different between the interests in domain name and persona