文档介绍：论陈那因明的逻辑体系摘要国内外因明专家对陈那因明做了大量的研究,他们为我们今天的深入研究和理解做了很多铺垫。但是遗憾的是,部分因明专家由于对基本概念(同、异品) 的错误理解,因而不能正确地刻画九句因、因三相、三支作法的逻辑形式。更有甚者,违背历史主义的研究方法,直接修改古人著作,从而建立一个与陈那因明本来面貌大异其趣的逻辑体系。本文在前人研究的基础之上,以唐代因明典籍为重要依据,以因明理论界相关专家学者的理论为基础,分析陈那《因明正理门论》所阐发的因明思想,指出当代因明研究者中的错误观点,并剖析其产生的根源,用符号逻辑为工具作逻辑与因明的比较研究。文章最后归纳和总结了前人在陈那因明逻辑体系理解上的错误问题。通过对陈那因明逻辑体系的研究,笔者认为本文有三方面的创新。首先,本文从源头上找到了现当代因明专家在同、异品概念上犯错误的根源。巫寿康博士的异品除宗概念来源于其导师沈有鼎先生的《关于因明的三张图表》中的异品表示,而这又是从齐思贻教授那里照搬过来的,但是齐思贻教授在文章中明确说到, 这一异品概念是来源于法称因明的。这就从根本上理清了基本概念之所以被部分专家误用的原因;其次,巫寿康博士在论述前人关于同、异品概念的分类时,没有遵循历史原貌。把前人的论述武断的分为两种,自己又独创了第三种异品,通过本文的研究发现,并非是他自己独创的异品概念。而是照搬齐思贻的异品概念来的;最后,本文较为系统的讨论了主项存在问题。对齐思贻教授、巫寿康博士、末木刚博教授在这个问题上的理解进行商榷,得出了自己独特的看法。关键词:陈那,因明,主项存在,逻辑中图分类号:B81 Abstracts: Experts athome and abroad have done agreat deal ofresearch on Dignaga’S present in-depth study andunderstanding ofHetuvidya owes much to theirprecedent ,some experts,due totheirmisunderstandings on onceptions,have made mistakes intrairOpya,hetucakra,three partsyllogism, and even thewhole logicsystem ofHetuvidya is not exempt from of them even directly misrepresented anclent writings,replacing tne on昏nal ot Dignaga’S Hetuvidya areblatant violations of theruleinclassics researchand can only be seen astheirsubjective bias. The pesent study,based on theprevious studies,withHetuvidya classicsinTang Dynasty asimportantreference,takes relevant experts’theories asthefoundation,and employs signal logic as a acomparative study between logic and Hetuvidya,I analyse thethoughts thatDignaga claims inNyfiyamukha,point outthe mistakes made bycontemporary researchers, explore the roots the end sum up themisunderstandings made byprecedent researchers on Dignaga’S logic system. This paper Can benoted forthefollowing three ,it found out the roots ofcontemporary researchers’mistakens on theconception ofthesame and Shoukang’Sconception ofexcludingpak[3 afromvi