文档介绍：硕士专业学位论文

论文题目讯问之全程录音录像与口供的任意性、
补强性及弹劾性
研究生姓名梁光明
指导教师姓名张成敏教授
专业名称法律硕士
研究方向刑事诉讼法学
论文提交日期 2010 年 9 月
讯问之全程录音录像与口供的任意性、补强性及弹劾性中文摘要
讯问之全程录音录像与口供的任意性、补强性及弹劾性
中文摘要
全程录音录像,作为一项正当程序的刑事诉讼司法制度,目前已在全国检察机关
的职务犯罪案件侦查工作中得到普遍应用,公安机关和法院在刑事侦查、审判工作中
也正在陆续运用。毋庸置疑,全程录音录像制度顺应时代要求,在现代刑事诉讼侦查
的固定证据、防止刑讯逼供及规范执法、保障人权等方面有其重要价值。正因为如此,
我们在肯定现有全程录音录像制度的客观价值时,更要关注基于程序正当性要求下的
全程录音录像规则价值的最大化。本文即以程序正当性理念为价值基础,结合国外的
相关规定,从口供证据的任意性、证据的补强性、弹劾性的角度出发,详细分析全程
录音录像的证据法基础,论述全程录音录像证据的补强性和弹劾性,在对我国现有全
程录音录像规范进行客观分析评价的基础上,深入思考全程录音录像规则的设计。
关键词:讯问全程录音录像口供任意性补强性弹劾性

作者:梁光明
指导教师:张成敏

II
讯问之全程录音录像与口供的任意性、补强性及弹劾性中文摘要
Examination of the Whole Recording and Confession of
the arbitrary, and impeachment of reinforcement
Abstract
Full audio and video recording, as a matter of due process in the criminal justice
system, the national public prosecutor's Office of crime in General, the public security
organs and the Court of Justice in criminal investigation and trial work is also being used.
Needless to say, the whole recording system conforming to the requirements of the modern
era, in the investigation of the evidence, the prevention of torture and standard law
enforcement and protection of human rights, has an important value. Because of this, we
must present the whole recording system objective value, more attention should be paid to
the validity of the request based on the program and the whole process of recording to
maximize the value of the rule. This procedural propriety idea value basis, in conjunction
with the relevant provisions of the foreign countries, evidence from the testimony of
arbitrariness, evidence of reinforcement, impeachment of perspective, a detailed analysis
of the entire recording of evidence Law Foundation, discusses the whole process of
recording evidence and impeachment of reinforcement of the existing full recording
specification objective analysis of the evaluation as well as on the overall design of the