文档介绍：英国刑事案件审查委员会再审审查程序研究中文提要 I 英国刑事案件审查委员会再审审查程序研究中文提要随着近年来刑事错案方面的报道不断出现, 我冤息诉的能力因此受到了极大的质疑, 整个刑事司法系统也因此面临严重的信任危机。在司法实践中, 由此导致的“再审难”与“申诉滥”成为了刑事司法的两大顽疾。其中, 最为核心的问题在于如何准确、有效地启动刑事再审程序。本文以刑事再审启动机制的基本作用作为研究切入点, 对现存的典型刑事错案纠正启动机制进行简要分析后, 选取英国的刑事案件复查委员会(CCRC ) 作为主要研究对象, 从英国基本的刑事错案救济制度入手, 从机构设置、人员构成、审查程序与规则、 RC 进行全方位的深入研究分析。并对以加拿大和美行比较, 深入分析论证独立审查制的优势所在。随后, 结合我国相关立法与司法实践进行对比分析, 指出我国刑事错案纠正困境的解决之道在于建立官方审查机构。最后, 结合国外有关设立类似机构的相关研究成果及我国学者的相关研究成果, RC 进行借鉴、移植可能出现的问题进行分析, 就我国刑事错案纠正的启动机 RC 的经验进行发展和完善得出最终结论: 即以省为单位, 设立独立的刑事案件审查委员会, 并指出了制度设计过程中需要注意的一系列问题, 供其他学者研究参考。关键词: 错案; 启动; 纠正; 效率; 公正作者: 钱兆宁指导教师: 张成敏英文提要英国刑事案件审查委员会再审审查程序研究 II Procedure of Criminal Cases mission Ab stract With recent reports of the miscarriage of justice in China. The ability of distinguish the miscarriage of justice of our criminal justice system were being questioned . So the entire criminal justice system was facing a serious crisis of confidence. In judicial practice, which made the "retrial difficult" and "abuse of complaints" became the two major ills of criminal justice. One of the most crucial problem is how to accurately and efficiently start criminal retrial procedure. In this paper, the bas ic role of the criminal retrial starting mechanism was the research starting point .After the analysis of existing boot mechanism of the criminal retrial. We selected British Criminal Case s Review Commi ssion (CCRC) as the main object of research. The rese arch RC start from the basic criminal appeal procedure of the British. Including the institutions, personnel, review procedures and rules, precedents and assistance systems of the CCRC. Canada and the United States represented by Attorney General mech anism and the Courts mechanism to start the system compare in order to analysis and demonstrate an independent review mechanism’s advantage. Then with China related legislation and judicial parative analysis, poi