1 / 11
文档名称:

膝关节炎治疗仪治疗膝骨关节炎临床观察.doc.doc

格式:doc   页数:11
下载后只包含 1 个 DOC 格式的文档,没有任何的图纸或源代码,查看文件列表

如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点这里二次下载

分享

预览

膝关节炎治疗仪治疗膝骨关节炎临床观察.doc.doc

上传人:jactupq736 2016/5/14 文件大小:0 KB

下载得到文件列表

膝关节炎治疗仪治疗膝骨关节炎临床观察.doc.doc

文档介绍

文档介绍:膝关节炎治疗仪治疗膝骨关节炎临床观察【摘要】目的:观察膝关节炎治疗仪治疗膝骨关节炎的临床疗效。方法:选择临床分期Ⅰ~Ⅲ期膝骨关节炎患者 70 例( 109 膝) ,采用随机数字表法按照临床分期随机分为治疗组 35例( 54膝) 和对照组 35例(55 膝) 。两组均在口服盐酸氨基葡萄糖胶囊的基础上,治疗组采用膝关节炎治疗仪治疗, 对照组采用 TDP 治疗器治疗, 每次 30 min , 每日 2次,治疗 2 个月, 观察治疗前后不同分期的膝关节运动功能、 WOMAC 骨关节炎指数、临床疗效。结果:完成治疗 65 例( 100 膝) ,其中治疗组 32 例( 49膝), 对照组 33例( 51膝)。治疗后, 两组膝关节运动功能评分Ⅰ~Ⅲ期均较治疗前明显增加( P< ) ;治疗组Ⅰ期、Ⅱ期增加程度均高于同分期对照组( P< 或P< ) 。两组治疗后膝关节 WOMAC 指数Ⅰ~Ⅲ期均较治疗前明显降低( P< ) ;治疗组Ⅰ期、Ⅱ期降低程度明显高于同分期对照组(P )。结论: 膝关节炎治疗仪能有效缓解膝骨关节炎的临床症状、改善关节功能, 其中Ⅰ期、Ⅱ期膝骨关节炎患者临床疗效明显优于 TDP 治疗器。【关键词】骨关节炎,膝;膝关节炎治疗仪;临床疗效 doi : .2095- Clinical Observation of Treating Knee Osteoarthritis with Therapeutic Apparatus LIN Mu-nan , LI Li, LIN Yan-hong , QIN Yin , LIN Yin-ying , ZHU Ding-yu , WU Ming-xia 【 ABSTRACT 】 Objective : To observe the clinical effect of treating knee osteoarthritis with therapeutic : 70 cases ( 109 knees ) with knee osteoarthritis of clinical stages Ⅰ~Ⅲ were randomly divided into a treatment group ( 35 cases , 54 knees ) and a control group ( 35 cases , 55 knees ) .Based on oral administration of glucosamine hydrochloride capsules , the treatment group were treated with therapeutic apparatus for knee osteoarthritis , while the control group were treated with TDP treatment device , 30 minutes each time and twice a 2 months ’ treatment , the motor function of knee joints , the WOMAC osteoarthritis index , and the clinical efficacy were observed before and after treatment in different : The treatment of 65 cases ( 100 knees ) was plished , among which 32 cases ( 49 knees ) belonged to the treatment group and 33 cases ( 51 knees ) were in the control treatment , the knee joint motion function scores of the two groups ( stage Ⅰ~ Ⅲ) significantly pared with those before treatment (P< ); the knee joint motion function scores of the treatment group in stage I and II were higher than those of the control group over the same period (P< orP