1 / 25
文档名称:

票据签章和银行预留印鉴不一致效力认定.doc

格式:doc   页数:25页
下载后只包含 1 个 DOC 格式的文档,没有任何的图纸或源代码,查看文件列表

如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点这里二次下载

分享

预览

票据签章和银行预留印鉴不一致效力认定.doc

上传人:hytkxy 2016/7/15 文件大小:0 KB

下载得到文件列表

票据签章和银行预留印鉴不一致效力认定.doc

文档介绍

文档介绍:法律硕士专业学位论文票据签章与银行预留印鉴不一致的效力认定 The signature of the bills with the bank set aside chop inconsistent effectiveness identified 作者姓名: 指导教师: 张靓静汪世虎西南政法大学 Southwest University of Political Science and Law 票据签章与银行预留印鉴不一致的效力认定内容摘要票据为动态的财产流转提供了便利,为经济活动中交易的双方提供了安全保障,其安全和便捷深深影响着商品交易的频率和效率,票据逐渐成为商事活动的重要工具。票据的功能和种类在其流通的过程中不断扩充,票据的价值也随之增加。票据的流通要依仗票据行为,票据行为中占据核心地位的则非票据签章莫属, 票据的签章是决定票据行为是否完成的关键,人们均以此外观形式来判断票据责任的承担者。法人是现代社会生活的主体,在票据法上,法人签章在以票据为载体的经济交往活动中也就极其重要。支票是法人这一商事主体进行交易的常用支付工具,因而出票行为中的签章也就成为重点研究的对象。本文从一起涉及由法人签发的支票的赔偿损害纠纷谈起而引发出对法人签章即其与预留印鉴不一致的效力问题的讨论。本文除引言和结语外,共分三大部分。第一部分,主要介绍票据纠纷案件的简单案情和相关争议焦点。即法人签章应符合什么条件才有效?法人签章与其预留印鉴不一致时,其效力如何? 第二部分,对法人签章的法定条件分析。从法人签章的构成要件、本质内涵以及法人签章特殊形态之效力等多个方面对法人签章进行了全面剖析。同时,对案例争议进行了评析。第三部分,对预留印鉴与法人支票出票签章不一致的效力认定。在准确理解预留印鉴的意义的基础上,结合案例,详细分析了预留印鉴与法人支票出票签章不一致时效力认定问题。关键词:法人签章;预留印鉴;出票签章 1 西南政法大学硕士学位论文 Abstract Bills provide the convenience for dynamic transfer, safety and security for economic activity in the trading of both sides, the safety and convenience ofa profound impact on the frequency and efficiency modity trading, because of its special economic use, and legal characteristics es important tool. functions and types of bills expanding in the course of its circulation, and also increases itself ’s value. The circulation of the bills relies on its behavior .Signature of the bills occupies a central position in the bills signature of the bill is to determine whether the bills pleted or not. People use the appearance of the bills to judge who have responsibility of the bills .Legal person is the main subject of modern social life. Legal signature on bills as the carrier of economic exchanges will be extremely important. The check monly used payment the act of signature have became the key object of the Negotiable Instruments. This paper discusses the about the signature of the Notes with the bank set aside chop inconsistent. In the first part of the body, mainly the simple facts of the case and the focus of controversy with a bi