1 / 23
文档名称:

Motorola-self-ass..doc

格式:doc   页数:23
下载后只包含 1 个 DOC 格式的文档,没有任何的图纸或源代码,查看文件列表

如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点这里二次下载

Motorola-self-ass..doc

上传人:管理资源吧 2012/1/1 文件大小:0 KB

下载得到文件列表

Motorola-self-ass..doc

文档介绍

文档介绍:Supplier Self Assessment Guidelines
The supplier shall identify a single point of contact to serve as the overall champion responsible piling information from each individual section of the capability mapping.
The supplier shall identify section champions for each section who will be responsible for ensuring all questions are answered thoroughly and accurately.
Each question of the capability mapping must be reviewed and scored prior to returning to Motorola. Strengths/Opportunities/Notes section to be fully utilized to support the score and to provide future action plans
Any question, the supplier scores as a “4” should be assumed to be a “best practice” or “best-in-class”.
All questions scored as a “4” require following from the supplier
An explanation that describes the supplier’pliance with the “4” score
Evidence in the form of documentation, records, charts, etc. are required to support a score of “4” and must be shown prior to the assessment team leaving the supplier facility.
The overall supplier champion will collect and review the self-assessment information from each of the supplier’s section champions.
The overall supplier champion will serve as Motorola’s single point of contact for further discussion on any issues raised with the self-assessment response.
The overall supplier champion will be responsible for ensuring that the self-assessment pleted in the time allotted by Motorola.
A soft copy of the Capability Mapping form is available that can be opened in Microsoft Word. Check boxes can be checked automatically by double clicking. Supporting statements can be typed directly into the text boxes. pleted form must be emailed back to the Motorola team leader in the same format as sent.
Supplier Name: Date:
Quality System
Quality Management
0 No reviews with management occur
2 Irregular reviews of quality metrics including field returns with management occur with some coverage of cycle ti