文档介绍：从理想到现实——非诉讼纠纷解决机制的正当性探析中文摘要
中文摘要
Alternative Dispute Resolution (简称 ADR),又称非诉讼纠纷解决方式、替代
性纠纷解决方式。现代非诉讼纠纷解决机制实践的重大成果都出现在美国,但是
非诉讼纠纷解决机制在美国也经历了一个从否定到肯定,进而被大力推广的过程。
美国的非诉讼纠纷解决机制的历程表明,非诉讼纠纷解决机制已经从原本的“替
代性”和“辅助性”地位发展为今天与民事诉讼机制并行不悖的纠纷解决机制。
当前我国社会深入转型和发展,非诉讼纠纷解决机制的外延一直处于动态发展之
中,随着新的纠纷解决方式不断被创造出来,这一机制也将不断得到扩充和完善。
本文试图从法治文化的传承孕育、利益诉求的多元催生、价值体现的多样嬗
变及成本和效益的选择四个角度切入,对非诉讼纠纷解决机制的正当性进行考究,
同时从美国和日本两种不同格局和中国的现实出发,通过对权力介入下行为不法、
利益驱动下行为错轨、舆论导引下行为乖张和个人非理性行为怪诞的现实反思,
从而提出对非诉讼纠纷解决机制正当性限度的思考,从立法和制度的层面,法律
规制和社会自治的层面论证,提出 ADR 补充司法中心是司法发展的必然。
关键词:ADR、价值、规制
作者:周晓佳
指导老师:胡玉鸿
I
英文摘要从理想到现实——非诉讼纠纷解决机制的正当性探析
From Ideal to Reality: Alternative Dispute Resolution
Mechanism Analysis of legitimacy
Abstract
Alternative Dispute Resolution (referred to as ADR),also called non-legal
dispute solution. Modern Alternative Dispute Resolution practice the important
achievement of all appeared in the United States, but Alternative Dispute Resolution in
the United States also experienced a from negation to affirmation, and was popularized
process. American Alternative Dispute Resolution process has shown, Alternative
Dispute Resolution has from the original "alternative" and "supporting" development
status for today and the civil litigation mechanism link dispute resolution mechanism.
The present society of our country further transformation and developme