1 / 20
文档名称:

英语本科毕业论文-冷战后的美国对外战略.doc

格式:doc   页数:20
下载后只包含 1 个 DOC 格式的文档,没有任何的图纸或源代码,查看文件列表

如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点这里二次下载

分享

预览

英语本科毕业论文-冷战后的美国对外战略.doc

上传人:3346389411 2013/3/20 文件大小:0 KB

下载得到文件列表

英语本科毕业论文-冷战后的美国对外战略.doc

文档介绍

文档介绍:本科毕业论文
冷战后的美国对外战略
学生姓名:
学生学号: 200310206011
院(系): 外国语学院
年级专业: 2003级英语本科3班
指导教师:
二〇〇七年五月
The US Foreign Strategies
in the Post-Cold War Era
Li Yunhe
Under the Supervision of
Yuan Bin
School of Foreign Languages and Cultures
Panzhihua University
May 2007
Content
Abstract……..……………………………………...…………..………I
Key Words…………………………………………………………………………...I
摘要……..........…………...………………………..…................................................Ⅱ
关键词……….......................................................................................................Ⅱ
Introduction………........................................................................................................1
Ⅰ. Brief Introduction of US Foreign Strategies in History………...............................2
Ⅱ. Different Foreign Strategies in the Post-Cold War Era…………………………....3
Foreign Strategy of Bush Government………………………………………...3
Foreign Strategy of Clinton Government……………………………………...5
Foreign Strategy of e W. Bush Government……………………………7
Ⅲ. Future Trends of US Foreign Strategies…………………………………….........10
Conclusion ……………………………………………….…………………………..12
Acknowledgements…………………………………………………………………..13
Notes………………………………………………………………………………….14
Bibliography………………………………………………………………………….15
Abstract
In the late 1980s and early 1990s, with the transformation of the East European socialist states, the reunification of Germany, and the disintegration of the Soviet Union, the Cold War ended, and the United States found itself at another watershed. However, it is more difficult to define and determine the interests, objectives, and means of American foreign strategy.
The Bush government advocated a foreign strategy of “New World Order”. The concept of “New World Order” includes the emphasis of American leadership in world affairs and the creation of a new “American century”. However, it was criticized for being ambiguous and impractical. Clinton paid more attention to internal affairs and promoted a foreign strat