1 / 10
文档名称:

牙钻手机机械清洗与手工清洗的效果评价.doc

格式:doc   页数:10页
下载后只包含 1 个 DOC 格式的文档,没有任何的图纸或源代码,查看文件列表

如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点这里二次下载

分享

预览

牙钻手机机械清洗与手工清洗的效果评价.doc

上传人:ying_zhiguo03 2015/9/24 文件大小:0 KB

下载得到文件列表

牙钻手机机械清洗与手工清洗的效果评价.doc

文档介绍

文档介绍:牙钻手机机械清洗与手工清洗的效果评价
[摘要] 目的比较牙钻手机机械清洗与手工清洗的效果。方法将污染程度相同的牙钻手机80支随机分成两组,每组40只,一组采用全自动清洗机清洗,另一组采用手工清洗,两组均按标准流程操作,清洗后采用ATP生物荧光法检测清洗效果。结果 ATP生物荧光检测相对发光单位(RLU)平均值分别为:机械清洗组为9,手工清洗组为41,两组均低于生产厂家提供的RLU≤45的推荐值,两组差异有统计学意义(P<)。结论机械清洗的效果优
于手工清洗,建议消毒供应中心采用机械清洗法清洗牙钻手机,确保清洗质量。
[关键词] 牙钻手机; 清洗效果; ATP生物荧光法
[中图分类号] R [文献标志码] A [doi] .
Effect of manual cleaning and machine cleaning for dental handpiece Zhou Xiaoli1, Huang Hao1, He Xiaoyan1, Chen Hui1, Zhou Xiaoying2. (1. Central Sterile Supply Department, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China; 2. Dept. of Thyroid and Breast, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China)
[Abstract] paring the dental handpiece’s cleaning
effect between manual cleaning and machine cleaning. Methods Eighty same contaminated dental handpieces were randomly divided into experimental group and control group, each group contains 40 pieces. The experimental group was treated by full automatic washing machine, and the control group was cleaned manually. The cleaning method was conducted according to the operations process standard, then ATP bioluminescence was used to test the cleaning results. Results Average relative light units(RLU) by ATP bioluminescence detection were as follows: Experimental group was 9, control group was 41. The two groups were less than the mended RLU value pr